The only kind of evidence I always focus on is the evidence that exists outside of the stories told about them — the kind of evidence you can take home with you in a wheelbarrow or examine under a microscope for example. But you believers always focus only on the testimonies and a few poorly taken photos. Testimony without evidence is nothing more than storytelling. I do not believe in storytales, I only believe in facts and there are no facts evident in any UFO report, just the poorly told storytales.

Just because someone is willing to die for their cause does not prove that their cause is based on fact. Religion has a long history of having people sacrificing their lives in vain for no good reason — as has politics. A cause can only be just and true if it is based on demonstrable facts.

Tom Brokaw has no evidence either, so who cares what his opinion on the matter is? Tom is an expert newscaster, not an expert UFOlogist or someone with some evidence for once.

Yes, one of these days you guys just might come up with some evidence for once instead of just more storytales, but in the meantime you guys are just going to have to continue to rely on blind faith belief. I will continue to rely on demonstrable facts, no matter who likes it or not.

I had to edit your piece to take out the profanity. Our site owner/ administrator’s rules.

PS — Does your mommy and daddy know you are using their computer without their permission?

From people like yourself. I would certainly never gullibly believe in such obviously make believe nonsense, just like I would never gullibly believe that there is any other form of observation other then the scientific one.

“No, hearing, seeing, smelling, tasting, feeling–well, that’s pretty much been my argument too”

In other words, you are unable to provide evidence for your false assertion that I dismissed other forms of observation, because no such forms were ever posted in any discussions, and you have no examples of any other forms that work. At least you are consistent, since you have made other false statements such as no one ever responds to me or that you would no longer respond to me anymore. Do you not care about your credibility (or lack thereof)? I guess not.

“You’re a nutter”

That means so much coming from somebody who has deluded themselves into believing they can diagnose and cure people by rubbing their feet. The only kind of people I know of that would work on are hypochondriacs and those with psychosomatic symptoms.

Clearly nothing you say can be taken as a professional opinion or anything but pure entertainment — not very good entertainment, but entertainment nonetheless.

There is nothing to dismiss where nothing of the sort was ever discussed to begin with. Obviously there is no other form of observation or path of inquiry, hence the reason you nor anyone else has ever mentioned one. Please enlighten us by telling us what other form of ‘observation’ has worked better other than the kind based on hearing, seeing, smelling, tasting, and feeling? Do you want to tell us the ESP or clairvoyance or women’s intuition or magic works better than observation based on hearing, seeing, smelling, tasting, and feeling? If you want to say yes to any of that, be warned that History tells us a much different story. Whereas science has practically reinvented civilization in the last 100 years, observation based on ESP or clairvoyance or women’s intuition or magic has done nothing and has made no progress within its ranks in the last 1000 years.