Comments on: Yet Another Roswell Witness Surfaces

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:30:03 +0000

Raven,

Vallee, if I’m recalling correctly, said that there was a material called “aluminized saran,” basically plastic wrap with metal glued or otherwise attached onto it. This explains some but not all of the witness testimony.

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:28:13 +0000

Sage,

I’m not sure about un-contradictory, but you notice my “Roswell crash is here to stay” comment is included as well.

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:26:43 +0000

RPJ,

I think Robert and Ryan Wood were doing something like this a few years ago. I don’t know how far they’ve gotten with this project.

By: Raven

Raven — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:09:34 +0000

Greg,

It’s always said that the “memory metal” found in 1947 at the Roswell site was beyond the technology of humans of that era.

However, I distinctly recall reading a rebuttal to that notion. If memory serves it came from Jacques Vallee, who gave the name of the metal and the company that produced it shortly before the 1947 Roswell event. I’ll be hornswoggled if I can remember where I read that citation. Does it ring any bells with you (or anyone else?)

~R~

By: RDT

RDT — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:03:20 +0000

The feds let the cat out of the bag in the very beginning when they initially admitted that they had recovered a crashed flying disk. That is historical fact. Everything they’ve said since then is so obviously a series of cover stories that a child can see through it. And their cover stories keep changing over the years. The Roswell story is true and everyone knows it. General Exon, Major Marcel, Col. Corso, and many others have come forward about the incident. All we’re missing now is an official press release saying that Roswell involved a flying saucer. Oh, that’s right, we already have that!

By: The_Sage

The_Sage — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:57:39 +0000

If after fifty years of investigation by UFOlogy’s best, nothing even remoltely conclusive or un-contradictory has ever turned up, why would this new story be the one exception? There are as many versions of the Roswell myth as there are different investigators researching it, and there are as many Roswell witnesses as there are people who are seeking to get their five minutes of fame. I wouldn’t be surprised if 200 years from now we will still be getting Roswell witnesses to come forward. Roswell may very well be the storytale that will never die, but it only won’t die for the kind of fringe groups that ordinary people like to point to and snicker at.

By: red pill junkie

red pill junkie — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:10:27 +0000

“…but it may be an important detail that can be checked against technological developments of the period.”

I dunno, maybe if someone checked what kind of material advancements they were doing in companies like BASF (german, which during the war had a branch called IG Farben, a company that created among other things the Zyklon B gas), and DUPONT (american) back in those days…