Aug 15 2007
|
|
CARET And Symbolic Writing
If you can stand it, please re-read the “Issac” website which contains this strange admonition:
On this site you will find some of these [classified papers]. They are available as high resolution scans that I am giving away free, PROVIDED THEY ARE NOT MODIFIED IN ANY WAY AND ARE KEPT TOGETHER ALONG WITH THIS WRITTEN MATERIAL.
This issue of editing the released material has come up already in connection with the SERPO episode. Many have suspected that this may have something to do with someone passing messages in the text. Is there some sort of “key” that unlocks the weird “alien” writing in the CARET material, along with the associated pages for those for whom the message is intended?
This opens up the subject of codes and ciphers, which is an interest of mine. If there is an easy way to break the “code,” then the operation is probably not as sophisticated as we might think. If not, it becomes more likely that we are dealing with something on the level of an intelligence operation.
“Issac,” for his part, explained that the strange symbols were more than just a language:
…their technology is different. It really did operate like the magical piece of paper sitting on a table, in a manner of speaking. They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of field. The language, a term I am still using very loosely, is a system of symbols (which does admittedly very much resemble a written language) along with geometric forms and patterns that fit together to form diagrams that are themselves functional. Once they are drawn, so to speak, on a suitable surface made of a suitable material and in the presence of a certain type of field, they immediately begin performing the desired tasks. It really did seem like magic to us, even after we began to understand the principles behind it.
On Whitley Strieber’s website, he journaled about the significance of these issues and earned the wrath of the skeptics (within and outside of ufology) for his assertion that “EVEN IF the entire Isaac production is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a hoax, and that may happen, the statement above [that the symbols activated the flying characteristsics of the "drone] is STILL true.” He goes on to say that the symbols are a sort of gateway to higher consciousness, as he believes some early crop circle designs to be as well.
This is a lot to swallow, even for me, but the basic idea that symbols can cause psychological in the percipient and even physical change in the environment is not new, of course. Strieber may have picked up this idea from his study of Gurdjieff, or from his “vitsitors,” or a combination of both. “Issac” may have used this idea as well. If so, and if he is a hoaxer, he may be skillfully dipping in to an area of esoterra which is seldom mentioned in the UFO field, but which some people (like Alan Greenfield, author of Secret Cypher of the Ufonauts) have been looking at for a long time.
CARET writing Sigil Mandala
Mandalas, yantras, and sigils are well-known to most elements of the occult community, and these visual aids to self-enlightenment bear closer scrutiny in the context of the CARET episode. Some of the patterns and shapes are given to students, and others are supposed to be created by the user for specific purposes. These objects of meditation are supposed to help the user identify his or her problems, define solutions, and even create some sort of symbiosis with the mind to bring about change. About 10 years ago, I created a personal sigil and had it tattoed on my arm. I believe that it’s still working.
It’s not a great leap to suggest that this sort of “technology,” if taken far enough, might enable a person to communicate in some way with energies and concepts that could be useful in the context of communicating with objects and machines, which is exactly what contactees and abductees have been saying for decades.
For some of you, this may be hard to swallow as well, but ol’ Whitley may be on to something, even if he chooses to look at this probable hoax as “real.” I’m not willing to take that leap, but since we play with theories and concepts here, it’s at least fun to think about.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, August 15th, 2007 at 9:34 pm and is filed under Abductions, Crop Circles, Government Projects, Hoaxes, Occult/Esoteric, Psychic Phenomena, UFOlogy, UFOmystic Exclusive, Wake Up Down There. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit BlinkList Google Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Related News Stories:
- Recent Alien Writing Examples »
- UFO? Drone? »
- Mind-Bogglingly Good Article on the Issac/ CARET/ Chad Issue »
- Pretty Funny (And Good) UFO “Drone” Video »
- The CARET Phenomenon, Continued »
|
August 16th, 2007 at 10:11 am
Well this brings us to two things: Astronomer Gerald Hawkins secret “diatonic” Euclid proof, found in the crop circles, and Robert Lomas’ latest Freemasonry book. The supposed power of Freemasonry, according to Lomas’ latest, is because the sacred geometry secret ritual language triggers the right-brain so that increased levels of proper parasympathetic brain juice develops. Considering that John Dee’s Enochian language is tied in with Freemasonic secret societies and Enochian is considered an E.T. language it’s not hard to see a Western lineage of gematria-based magic as the key to secret alien language.
Professor Hawkin’s supposedly new Euclidian proof based on “diatonic” harmonics is really not new at all. Archytas (the military engineer dictator buddy of Plato) relied on the ratio 4:5 (major third harmonic) or 5:4 (cube root of two) and 8:5 (minor sixth harmonic) for creating his geometric mean as a logarithmic continuum (instead of the pure geometry of Euclid). See my blogbook, “Secret of the Greek Freemasonic Miracle” chapter for details.
The diatonic scale that Hawkins relies on for the secret language of the aliens is still logarithmic — (i.e. one-to-one correspondence of number to letter) — just as gematria is logarithmic (the language of western magic using sacred geometry).
In contrast NON-western magic relies on asymmetry whereby the harmonics are not “diatonic” but instead an infinite resonance of the ratio 2:3 as its complimentary opposite 3:4. Gurdjieff confuses western readers very easily because he converts the Tetrad (1:2 and 2:3 and 3:4 — or the sacred geometry equilateral triangle) into logarithmic, decimal-based numbers for the Enneagram, thereby causing people to misunderstand the Law of Three and the Law of Seven connection). In nonwestern music, enabling alchemical magic, the symbolic letter-harmonic ratio “C to G” is 2:3 while it’s inversion “G to C” is 3:4. The asymmetry of nonphonetic symbols and their connection to harmonic resonance violates the equipartition principle of Western sacred geometry (be it PI or the Golden Ratio. PI is a “transcendental” number but still relies on the algebraic concept of a LOGARITHMIC infinite series as does the Golden Ratio, the central figure of sacred geometry and Freemasonry).
So in Babylonian Magic the concept of phonetic syllables was developed using logarithms (but without zero, the key cipher of Western logic, which came from the Brahmins). Babylon used a 60-based number system but the Tetrad of asymmetric harmonics as 2:3, Yang, and 3:4, Yin, (Gurdjieff’s Law of Three) was converted to 6:8::9:12 and this “diatonic” model of gematria was used to create the 5:4, the cube root of two, ratio for Gerald Hawkin’s “diatonic” secret of the crop circles.
My point being that the crop circle “secret” language is no older than the Babylonians or Greeks — it’s Freemasonry and not even nonwestern language.
In contrast, the oldest phonetic language, the hieratic demotics of Egypt, use only a “long vowel” in the writing. (btw, CIA-sponsored Egyptology, via the Stargate Conspiracy, is obsessed with projecting logarithmic-based gematria back on to ancient Egypt, even though there was no Freemasonic Golden Ratio in Egypt). As language gets older there is more emphasis on long vowels because long vowels create the Perfect Fifth or yang 2:3 harmonics (hence OHM as heart chakra) for alchemy. The Bushmen language is the most musical and hardest to learn language. Early language is also called “musilanguage.”
When the visual sense is dominant it’s based on the concept of “containing” infinity through a symbol (this happened as the “symbolic revolution” of anthropocentric sacred geometry, around 9,000 BCE). But when the auditory sense (for forest hunter-gatherers) is dominant then spacetime is bent by listening to its source — formless awareness that can not be visualized. This is why “justice is blind” yet justice can be heard.
In other words the Gods or Aliens became anthropocentric and hierarchical after the visual sense was dominant while before, for hunter-gatherers, all animals and life is considered equal. Although, as Barry Lopez, details, some animals were considered better hunters (i.e., eagle, bear, wolf, wild cat) and therefore given control of the four sacred directions. The hunter-gatherers and the early pastoralists still use a Lunar calendar (and the moon controls the Third Eye pineal gland) while the Freemasonic Aliens rely on left-brain phonetic language for an equal-tempered sacred geometry that worships the Sun.
August 16th, 2007 at 12:14 pm
This whole thing of linking sacred geometry, resonance, mandalas and occultist diagrams with alien writing is really becoming fascinating. It could also open more questions than answers because it may once more put a dominant role in the observer to the effects observed on reality.
Does the mandala have a power of its own, or is it simply a tool aimed to trigger the change of the obrserver’s consciousness. And if so, what does that mean if those same rules apply in the “material” realm?
I mean, if you think about it, enlightment scientist discovered the secrets of electricity when they began to arrange different materials and chemicals in special geometric patterns, and all the people who talk about antigravity linked to magnetism say that it has to do with arranging the magnets forming distinctive geometric patterns to creat these special fields that supposedly cancel the effect of gravity. I know Richard Hoagland is very unreliable these days when he tries to describe what he think he sees on the photos taken by the Rovers on Mars, but before that he was talking about how the anomalies he found on Mars that “could” be ancient structures, could be the key to a new understanding in what he called “Hyperphysics” Physics of may dimensions, and that was strongly linked with geometry,
I still think CARET is mainly bogus, but I, like Strieber, also thought on the possibility that Crop circles are meant to “stir” something on the person that looks upon them. And since these symbols are now known throughout the world, they may be serving a very important purpose. Which is I don’t have the faintest ideas.
Drew hempel. Everything you wrote is awfully interesting. But I’m really finding a lot of trouble following your thoughts on all this. Is there any way you could put all this in more… laymen terms? Simplify it a little bit perhaps?
August 16th, 2007 at 4:07 pm
Drew,
As the other commenter said (and I’ve been meaning to say this for awhile) it would be nice if you could explain your thinking in your posts, for those who are not familiar with your knowledge. I’m certainly in that group, depending on what you’re talking about. Also, it might help if the comments were not as long (or longer) than the original post. Either that, or perhaps link the extended discussion to your site. That said, I do continue to find new ideas and connections in your commentary.
I’m just trying to keep things accessible for more people.
Thanks,
Greg
August 16th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
I wouldn’t give the CARET thing too much credit as ‘mandala’s or anything along those lines. The illustrations found in the document seem to be simple copies of Illustrator ‘tech-brushes’ which are all the rage in vector graphics circles (pardon the pun) these days.
Kind regards,
Greg
August 17th, 2007 at 12:28 am
Greg,
I know they may “seem” to be copies, but this is why I qualified my statements as an intellectual exercise. Playing with seemingly disparate or even stupid concepts sometimes leads to useful realizations. At least I got to visit a bit with my “old friend,” the sigil.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:31 am
Hi Greg,
I agree, it’s a very interesting topic (note my previous discussions of McKenna/DMT and language/logos), and I certainly don’t disparage your commentary. I’d just hate anyone to take this CARET stuff seriously…
Kind regards,
Greg
August 17th, 2007 at 12:35 am
redpill,
You said:
It could also open more questions than answers because it may once more put a dominant role in the observer to the effects observed on reality.
Exactly. This is the sort of thing I was referring to in the reply to Greg T.
It’s unfortunate that Hoagland is percieved as (and probably is) going off the beam quite a lot, becuase if he couched his statements in a “what if” or “consider this” way, he might not be perceived as such. He seems driven to say that each new idea he comes up with is “real” or “true.” I suppose this gets him a much bigger audience, but at the expense of many people who would otherwise take him more seriously.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:41 am
Greg,
I guess I’m taking it nominally seriously on a level that I find interesting, but like I wrote in the post, extrapolating fron these ideas takes us to places we might not otherwise have explored. Just following the lead of my heroes like Keel, Vallee, Martin Kottmeyer, Dennis Stillings, etc.
August 17th, 2007 at 7:09 am
Fascinating! Most Christians don’t realize that the ancient Hebrews believed that there were three “realities” to scripture; the story, the meaning and the “hidden symbolic truth” (meaning that the scripture itself held some kind of cosmic key). Watch the movie Pi if you have a chance. Christianity is also rich in golden ratio references. The symbol for Christ is Ixthus (Vesica Pisces). The fish symbol is actually an ancient dipiction of the concept of perfection (God) represented by a the circle (infinate, never ending) moving (creating). When the circle is moved, the overlap creates the “fish”. Meaning that when God went from being inactive to being active, reality (Christ), was manifested. Ichthus was actually chosen as a reference to Christ because it is an acrostic word spelling out the phrase “Jesus Christ, of God, the Son, the Savior”. Fascinating that the geometry and the actual translation of the words in Greek are unrelated but the same. Mirroring the idea of the Trinity (3 in 1) and the idea (verse) “the Word is God”.
August 17th, 2007 at 9:21 am
Hi Greg Taylor — of Daily Grail right? Consider G. Nimtz’ research featured in the latest New Scientist. I’ve been promoting his research online for the past couple years and finally it’s getting some attention. G. Nimtz and Raymond Chiao of Berkeley both rely on phase-shift of asymmetric resonance.
The asymmetric resonance is made with “left-hand materials” which violate causality and conservation of energy or the asymmetric resonance is made with longitudinal waves, as with sound waves.
In other words information has now been proven to travel faster than the speed of light. Einstein was wrong.
Raymond Chiao’s experiments are considered to be alchemical because he is transducing energy from gravity waves.
Tesla was doing the same and Tesla insisted on using ONLY sine-waves, just as John Keely used.
The Tai-chi symbol represents this “mandala” of asymmetric sine-wave alchemical resonance but the tantra symbol of the six-sided star can also be achieved from Kepler’s secret symbol — a circle circumscribing and inscribing an equilateral triangle. The reason an equilateral triangle (made up of 10 dots as the Tetrad 1:2:3:4) causes asymmetrical resonance is because the distance between the Numbers are not equal-tempered but instead are complimentary opposites. So again in music the Perfect Fifth is 2:3 as Yang and resonates into the Perfect Fourth, 3:4 as Yin. The natural law of overtones states that this asymmetrical resonance tranduces the whole energy spectrum but the source of the spontaneous symmetry breaking is pure formless awareness or dimensionless knowless, beyond causality, beyond spacetime.
August 17th, 2007 at 9:55 am
This asymmetric resonance ceratinly seems worth checking out. Thanks for the tip!
PS: So Greg, what kind of Sigil you designed for your tattoo, you rebel?
I’ve always wanted to get a tattoo of the Ollin nahuatl symbol
http://www.cete-sonora.gob.mx/AFDA/cursos/materiales_cd/proyectos/tlacuilos_pergaminos/tlacui3.htm
… but I have been too much of a pussy
August 17th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
In regards to the symbols somehow having “magical” properties. What if it is the language of God? And if that is true, then it very well could work simply by the very fact that Gods’ word alone can cause changes in the elemental universe on an awe inspiring scale. All the physical laws fly out the window so to speak. Is this so hard to believe?
August 19th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
Bob and hiplane,
I think that symbols have to speak to us, therefore the symbols I’m talking about have to make sense to humans. If we had a direct connection to the infinite or the divine, we wouldn’t have to represent it in writing.
We might be making a mistake though if we assign a source to the message embedded in any inscrutable mystical symbols as issuing from something we think is important. Channelers often seem to think that they’ve tapped into The Source, only to have their utterings put people to sleep.
August 19th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
redpill,
The symbol is a sigil I created embedded within a dharma wheel.