<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFOs: Why No Open Contact?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: craig york</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5501</link>
		<dc:creator>craig york</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5501</guid>
		<description>In The Sage's reply, there is a germ of
 a valid notion: The 'aliens' simply may
 be/have been indifferent to contact, or
 at least to prolonged contact. There is
 even a cultural paralell in human 
 history: The explorations of Chinese
 Admiral Zheng He in the early Fifteenth
 century. The comparison is by no means
 exact, but there you are. For a quarter
 century a vast fleet of ships explored
 as far as Madagascar to the west, and
 extensively in the eastern Pacific. 
 They then went home, and stayed there,
 as China withdrew from further 
 exploration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In The Sage&#8217;s reply, there is a germ of<br />
 a valid notion: The &#8216;aliens&#8217; simply may<br />
 be/have been indifferent to contact, or<br />
 at least to prolonged contact. There is<br />
 even a cultural paralell in human<br />
 history: The explorations of Chinese<br />
 Admiral Zheng He in the early Fifteenth<br />
 century. The comparison is by no means<br />
 exact, but there you are. For a quarter<br />
 century a vast fleet of ships explored<br />
 as far as Madagascar to the west, and<br />
 extensively in the eastern Pacific.<br />
 They then went home, and stayed there,<br />
 as China withdrew from further<br />
 exploration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uth</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5500</link>
		<dc:creator>uth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5500</guid>
		<description>There is that quote from the Herbert Schirmer case...   "We want you to believe in us, but not too much"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is that quote from the Herbert Schirmer case&#8230;   &#8220;We want you to believe in us, but not too much&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5493</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5493</guid>
		<description>If the ETs are trying to avoid contact, they have failed. If the ETs are trying to make contact, they have failed. If the ETs are studying us, they have failed because they have contaminated our culture. If the ETs are preparing us for future contact, they have failed because the only people that take the ETs seriously are also the laughing stock of the world. If the ETs are harvesting us like cattle, they are incompetent (why take egg and sperm when a simple swab of saliva from the mouth will provide all the DNA they would ever need?). If the ETs are here for purposes that have little or nothing to do with us, they have succeeded because it is as if ETs have never existed...now imagine that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the ETs are trying to avoid contact, they have failed. If the ETs are trying to make contact, they have failed. If the ETs are studying us, they have failed because they have contaminated our culture. If the ETs are preparing us for future contact, they have failed because the only people that take the ETs seriously are also the laughing stock of the world. If the ETs are harvesting us like cattle, they are incompetent (why take egg and sperm when a simple swab of saliva from the mouth will provide all the DNA they would ever need?). If the ETs are here for purposes that have little or nothing to do with us, they have succeeded because it is as if ETs have never existed&#8230;now imagine that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-why-no-open-contact/#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>A valid question.

I can think of a couple of possible answers.

1)  Bloody tourists.  (A possible explanation for lots of supposed alien behavior.) In this case, they want to see exotic locales but don't care to interact much with the wildlife.

2)  When entomologists travel to the rain forests of Brazil, how much time to they spend talking to the bugs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A valid question.</p>
<p>I can think of a couple of possible answers.</p>
<p>1)  Bloody tourists.  (A possible explanation for lots of supposed alien behavior.) In this case, they want to see exotic locales but don&#8217;t care to interact much with the wildlife.</p>
<p>2)  When entomologists travel to the rain forests of Brazil, how much time to they spend talking to the bugs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
