<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFOs: The News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: drew hempel</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5455</link>
		<dc:creator>drew hempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5455</guid>
		<description>Nick -- thanks for the reply!  I'll look for that FATE book.  It's kind of like the father of Sci-Fi -- Hugo whatever.  So he's always attacked as having been too much of a nuts and bolts man with no real psychological depth.  He created that "osophone" for example - hearing with your teeth.  Amazing.  Anyway but his primary concept was the

"self-perpetuating vortex."

Which, to me, is totally Fortean -- can't remember what Fort called them, oh yeah - the teleporting vortices.

I think Fort did figure out the secret of the Trickster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8212; thanks for the reply!  I&#8217;ll look for that FATE book.  It&#8217;s kind of like the father of Sci-Fi &#8212; Hugo whatever.  So he&#8217;s always attacked as having been too much of a nuts and bolts man with no real psychological depth.  He created that &#8220;osophone&#8221; for example - hearing with your teeth.  Amazing.  Anyway but his primary concept was the</p>
<p>&#8220;self-perpetuating vortex.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which, to me, is totally Fortean &#8212; can&#8217;t remember what Fort called them, oh yeah - the teleporting vortices.</p>
<p>I think Fort did figure out the secret of the Trickster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Redfern</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5453</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5453</guid>
		<description>Hi Drew:

Kevin disagreed with the info on the book. We had a debate about it in a "UFO Special" book that "Fate Magazine" published about 2 years ago, and which I think is still available.

Interestingly, the book (which also included papers on Roswell from various other "Fate" contributors) also included papers from John Keel, two of which mentioned a Japanese angle that he had come across - one of which was linked with bodies.

As for Baktar: well, I think that like so many of these alleged UFO entities (and related beings, intelligences etc), in many cases there is an interaction with "something" but my view is that while this "something" is an intelligence of some sort, it's one that's probably always been with us. But that it is one which has changed over the years to suit the times - and isn't ET in origin. Though it may suit its "trickster" purpose to have us believe that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Drew:</p>
<p>Kevin disagreed with the info on the book. We had a debate about it in a &#8220;UFO Special&#8221; book that &#8220;Fate Magazine&#8221; published about 2 years ago, and which I think is still available.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the book (which also included papers on Roswell from various other &#8220;Fate&#8221; contributors) also included papers from John Keel, two of which mentioned a Japanese angle that he had come across - one of which was linked with bodies.</p>
<p>As for Baktar: well, I think that like so many of these alleged UFO entities (and related beings, intelligences etc), in many cases there is an interaction with &#8220;something&#8221; but my view is that while this &#8220;something&#8221; is an intelligence of some sort, it&#8217;s one that&#8217;s probably always been with us. But that it is one which has changed over the years to suit the times - and isn&#8217;t ET in origin. Though it may suit its &#8220;trickster&#8221; purpose to have us believe that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew hempel</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5452</link>
		<dc:creator>drew hempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/ufos-the-news/#comment-5452</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick:  What's your take on Baktar?  And how did Kevin Randle handle your Body Snatcher book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick:  What&#8217;s your take on Baktar?  And how did Kevin Randle handle your Body Snatcher book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
