<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The X-Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Redfern</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>Sage:

No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage:</p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Nick:

The fact that you bothered to read what the skeptics had to say is evidence that you care what they had to say. It does not matter whether you commented on what they said or not. It is just an observation.

Speaking of observations, I notice that the skeptics also claim to not bother nor care what the believers have to say, yet they bother to listen and read to the believers and care enough to post what the believers have to say.

"'The important thing is what (a man) talks about, not whether he agrees with it or not' (Collected Works of Carl Jung, Vol 5, para 99)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>The fact that you bothered to read what the skeptics had to say is evidence that you care what they had to say. It does not matter whether you commented on what they said or not. It is just an observation.</p>
<p>Speaking of observations, I notice that the skeptics also claim to not bother nor care what the believers have to say, yet they bother to listen and read to the believers and care enough to post what the believers have to say.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;The important thing is what (a man) talks about, not whether he agrees with it or not&#8217; (Collected Works of Carl Jung, Vol 5, para 99)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Redfern</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>Sage:

I will say again (YAWN) that I don't care what the skeptics think - if I did, instead of just posting the story I would also have posted a long commentary from me addressing the skeptical comments in the article.

The fact that I did not post my own views is surely evidence that I couldn't be bothered to deal with the skeptical view contained within!

However, my own personal views aside, this is also a legitimate news story that would be of interest to people in ufology.

I figured that probably people who visit the site would find it interesting. It took me 2 minutes to post it, so I posted it.

People can read it and comment if they wish. But, again: the fact that I posted it without comments from me addressing the skeptics is evidence that I don't care about their views.

But that doesn't give me the right to prevent other people seeing the data if it's a newsworthy story too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage:</p>
<p>I will say again (YAWN) that I don&#8217;t care what the skeptics think - if I did, instead of just posting the story I would also have posted a long commentary from me addressing the skeptical comments in the article.</p>
<p>The fact that I did not post my own views is surely evidence that I couldn&#8217;t be bothered to deal with the skeptical view contained within!</p>
<p>However, my own personal views aside, this is also a legitimate news story that would be of interest to people in ufology.</p>
<p>I figured that probably people who visit the site would find it interesting. It took me 2 minutes to post it, so I posted it.</p>
<p>People can read it and comment if they wish. But, again: the fact that I posted it without comments from me addressing the skeptics is evidence that I don&#8217;t care about their views.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t give me the right to prevent other people seeing the data if it&#8217;s a newsworthy story too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3233</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3233</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to...

"To be honest, it boils down to the fact that, for the most part, I simply can’t be bothered to care about what the skeptics think, because life is too short to worry about them; and I’m too busy trying to share data with those that realize there is a genuine mystery to be solved"

Why bother with this story then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;To be honest, it boils down to the fact that, for the most part, I simply can’t be bothered to care about what the skeptics think, because life is too short to worry about them; and I’m too busy trying to share data with those that realize there is a genuine mystery to be solved&#8221;</p>
<p>Why bother with this story then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mouseonmoon</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>mouseonmoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Seems to me Bassett would have gotten more 'attention' 
if he'd snagged former Gov Symington for this,
and Daniel Sheehan ( who was at the conference), 
 also turn the mic over to  Cheryll Jones 
( former newswoman with excellent 'stage presence',
conspicuously absent here) ?

Plain and simple, these folks are already 'known' in the news,
while locally Bassett is the 'UFO candidate', not exactly taken seriously
by the media , KWIM. Best advice for him would be to step back...

Milbank is a pretty dull humorist WP columnist 
and Paradign should have
'known' he would be covering this and been
 prepared. It's kinda like the 
'emperor has no clothes here' situation....

I was at the X-conference Sat.and
from what I saw of "Fastwalkers" was excellent,
(but Niles is a bit too much...).

hey,jus an opinion,

m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me Bassett would have gotten more &#8216;attention&#8217;<br />
if he&#8217;d snagged former Gov Symington for this,<br />
and Daniel Sheehan ( who was at the conference),<br />
 also turn the mic over to  Cheryll Jones<br />
( former newswoman with excellent &#8217;stage presence&#8217;,<br />
conspicuously absent here) ?</p>
<p>Plain and simple, these folks are already &#8216;known&#8217; in the news,<br />
while locally Bassett is the &#8216;UFO candidate&#8217;, not exactly taken seriously<br />
by the media , KWIM. Best advice for him would be to step back&#8230;</p>
<p>Milbank is a pretty dull humorist WP columnist<br />
and Paradign should have<br />
&#8216;known&#8217; he would be covering this and been<br />
 prepared. It&#8217;s kinda like the<br />
&#8216;emperor has no clothes here&#8217; situation&#8230;.</p>
<p>I was at the X-conference Sat.and<br />
from what I saw of &#8220;Fastwalkers&#8221; was excellent,<br />
(but Niles is a bit too much&#8230;).</p>
<p>hey,jus an opinion,</p>
<p>m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uv777bk</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>uv777bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-x-conference/#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>I'm sure Stephen Bassett will be used to the usual 'hatchet job' that the Washington Post do.  And to be honest, I never really expect press opinions to change too much.

Now, I have to admit that I do like Bassett and that he makes the effort more than most.  The trouble is, no matter how many in-roads he makes with whatever presidential hopefuls, etc... I'm just too pessimistic to think that he's doing anything other than trying to plait fog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Stephen Bassett will be used to the usual &#8216;hatchet job&#8217; that the Washington Post do.  And to be honest, I never really expect press opinions to change too much.</p>
<p>Now, I have to admit that I do like Bassett and that he makes the effort more than most.  The trouble is, no matter how many in-roads he makes with whatever presidential hopefuls, etc&#8230; I&#8217;m just too pessimistic to think that he&#8217;s doing anything other than trying to plait fog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
