Comments on: The Roswell Legacy

By: misteranderson

misteranderson — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:20:34 +0000

I don’t know how anyone can take Roswell seriously, especially after Karl Pflock’s book. It’s a myth being presented as investigative journalism. The pieces don’t add up

By: Nick Redfern

Nick Redfern — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:16:50 +0000

Mac
Yeah, it’s kind of confusing. Marcel’s book was published last year as “The Roswell Legacy,” and it’s credited to Jesse Marcel Jr, Ron Kaye, and Connie L. Schmidt.

However, the new “The Roswell Legacy” is credited to Jesse Marcel Jr and Linda Marcel.

Plus, the 2007 book discusses Marcel’s 1990 meeting with an official to discuss Roswell, the black budget world, etc.

But the blurb for the new book talks about a “recent” encounter “with a high US official.”

So, 1990 can hardly be described as recent, which makes me think the new edition is different or updated in some ways from last year’s book.

Anyway, I have the original, and will read the new one at some point next week, and see what’s new re this “recent” comment.

By: Mac Tonnies

Mac Tonnies — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:15:21 +0000

I thought “The Roswell Legacy” was published some time ago . . .

Pflock’s book is far and away the best of the Roswell debunking books. I don’t think it’s the final word, but it’s well-researched and a pleasure to read.

By: misteranderson

misteranderson — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:21:07 +0000

Has anyone read Karl Pflock’s Roswell? Any opinions about that book?

By: Nick Redfern

Nick Redfern — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:29:42 +0000

Of course! Now it becomes clear! LOL.

By: BenDoverEsq.

BenDoverEsq. — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:54:22 +0000

“I’m not sure why the publisher has sent me a copy now in Word form.”
Cause you da man Nick!