<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mothman&#8217;s Photographer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mothphotog</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/#comment-6252</link>
		<dc:creator>mothphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1386#comment-6252</guid>
		<description>Drew:

You found probably the most tenuous little ditty in my blog, so... Congratulations! I was aware that it was pushing it when I wrote it, but I put it in there anyway because I have a slightly twisted sense of humor, especially after a couple of beers.

I am probably going to take that reference out at some point, for the simple reason that it diverts from other more serious linkages, such as those between the name of the Egyptian goddess "Mut" and the "Moth-man." Those are indeed something to be considered, because they speak to the point about "hoaxes" in the paranormal having symbological power.  Not that the name Mothman is a hoax, necessarily, but it certainly wasn't the most prudent choice.  Calling it the "Garuda" would have been much better because a lot of confusion would have been avoided - unless the point WAS to create confusion.

For instance just today, I was adding a reference to Mothman III about how a Mothman list member writing a possibly false story about a "wire" coming down from the sky. Strangely, the death of their dear friend five years later was preceded - by just a day or two - by a very real sighting, by a documented Mothman witness, of a "wire creature" in their home.  The point I tried to make in the book is that we all learn not to "cry wolf" for a reason.  And that reason is that the superspectrum picks up on such things and sends them back to us in unpredictable ways... Sometimes the time lag is so great that we don't realize what happened.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew:</p>
<p>You found probably the most tenuous little ditty in my blog, so&#8230; Congratulations! I was aware that it was pushing it when I wrote it, but I put it in there anyway because I have a slightly twisted sense of humor, especially after a couple of beers.</p>
<p>I am probably going to take that reference out at some point, for the simple reason that it diverts from other more serious linkages, such as those between the name of the Egyptian goddess &#8220;Mut&#8221; and the &#8220;Moth-man.&#8221; Those are indeed something to be considered, because they speak to the point about &#8220;hoaxes&#8221; in the paranormal having symbological power.  Not that the name Mothman is a hoax, necessarily, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t the most prudent choice.  Calling it the &#8220;Garuda&#8221; would have been much better because a lot of confusion would have been avoided - unless the point WAS to create confusion.</p>
<p>For instance just today, I was adding a reference to Mothman III about how a Mothman list member writing a possibly false story about a &#8220;wire&#8221; coming down from the sky. Strangely, the death of their dear friend five years later was preceded - by just a day or two - by a very real sighting, by a documented Mothman witness, of a &#8220;wire creature&#8221; in their home.  The point I tried to make in the book is that we all learn not to &#8220;cry wolf&#8221; for a reason.  And that reason is that the superspectrum picks up on such things and sends them back to us in unpredictable ways&#8230; Sometimes the time lag is so great that we don&#8217;t realize what happened.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew hempel</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/#comment-6251</link>
		<dc:creator>drew hempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1386#comment-6251</guid>
		<description>I was just reading his blog.  Certainly "entertaining" but the stream of consciousness style gets a bit too worked over.  He sees one connection and runs with it without prioritizing anything.  Worst of all is the numerology-type etymology:

The name Mothman, while supposedly lifted from Batman, is actually not far off from the many other “mon” words Peter Moon details in his work. Just clip the top of the “h” off, creating an “n,” and switch the “n” with the “t” in Mothman, and you have “Montman.”

Puh-lease!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reading his blog.  Certainly &#8220;entertaining&#8221; but the stream of consciousness style gets a bit too worked over.  He sees one connection and runs with it without prioritizing anything.  Worst of all is the numerology-type etymology:</p>
<p>The name Mothman, while supposedly lifted from Batman, is actually not far off from the many other “mon” words Peter Moon details in his work. Just clip the top of the “h” off, creating an “n,” and switch the “n” with the “t” in Mothman, and you have “Montman.”</p>
<p>Puh-lease!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red pill junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/#comment-6250</link>
		<dc:creator>red pill junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1386#comment-6250</guid>
		<description>What intrigued me was John Keel's comment, as shown on the back cover of the book:

&lt;i&gt;"Obsessed..."&lt;/i&gt;

... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What intrigued me was John Keel&#8217;s comment, as shown on the back cover of the book:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Obsessed&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230; <img src='http://www.ufomystic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reganlee</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/the-mothmans-photographer/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>reganlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1386#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>I really liked this book a lot! It took me a little bit of time to get used to the style; once I did however it made sense. I think anyone interested in Mothman needs to read this book. I don't know where I am with Colvin's Garuda theory; it's not that I don't agree with it, I just ... don't know. But it's interesting and fascinating; a lot there. A LOT there, lol. Good reading. I'm glad to know Mothman Photographer's III will be out in the Fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked this book a lot! It took me a little bit of time to get used to the style; once I did however it made sense. I think anyone interested in Mothman needs to read this book. I don&#8217;t know where I am with Colvin&#8217;s Garuda theory; it&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t agree with it, I just &#8230; don&#8217;t know. But it&#8217;s interesting and fascinating; a lot there. A LOT there, lol. Good reading. I&#8217;m glad to know Mothman Photographer&#8217;s III will be out in the Fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
