Texas UFO Secrets
Is it possible that the recent UFO encounter at Stephenville, Texas was the result of not an alien craft, but the testing of advanced, military hardware of a very unusual kind?
Some people are certainly now looking in that direction.
The Arizona Daily Star says: “Some experts say it’s possible that instead of little green men at the helm of Unidentified Flying Objects sighted in Texas skies the past two months, Air Force pilots could be secretly working out the kinks in the next U-2 spy plane or B-2 stealth bomber.”
The newspaper continues:
“Secret technology could be giving house-size spheres the power to zoom around in incredible maneuvers or allowing mother ships a mile long and a half mile wide to hover over central and west Texas. After all, the military has experimental technologies the public might not know about until decades after development.”
Here’s the link to the rest of the article.
Before we dismiss such matters out of hand, it’s worth noting that, as Greg’s Project Beta book amply demonstrated, the military has on more than several occasions utilized the UFO subject as convenient camouflage for its own secret activities and projects of a defense, intelligence and psy-op nature…
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 at 9:30 am and is filed under The Redfern Files, Breaking News, Eyewitness Accounts, Alien Encounters, Government Projects, UFO Sightings, Media Appearances, Books, Conspiracies, Close Encounters, Evidence, UFOlogists, UFOlogy, Beliefs. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit Ma.gnolia Technorati Help
- Related News Stories:
- Take the Quiz… »
- UFOs and Marilyn Monroe »
- Anomalist News »
- Interview Posted »
- Hidden Headlines of Texas »
|
Jan 30 2008 
January 30th, 2008 at 10:53 am
I’m still very, very confused if there is anything like a coherent picture of what was seen in Stephenville, and when and where. The press reports are worse than nothing.
As near as I can determine not having investigated myself, the most reliable reports are simply of nocturnal lights. Just lights. You don’t need hyper-exotic technologies to emit light.
That said, that area doesn’t strike me as a great place to test such technologies if the Air Force did have them, which I doubt. Reading Ben Rich’s account of the development of stealth, it is clear that the government is far an infinite font of technical know-how.
January 30th, 2008 at 11:57 am
When did it become policy to test fly the newest secret technology in plain sight over large swaths of civilian population? Kind of defeats the whole purpose of having black budget projects if you simply intend to parade them around for all to see.
~R~
January 30th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
It is a very strong possibility.
And we do know of anothr case in Texas when three witneses (two women and a child) observes what could have been an experimental aircraft in trouble surrounded by choppers (remember that one?)
But we also have to keep in mind this: would the Air Force risk to test exotic experimental (and posibly dangerous) avionics so near George W. Bush’s ranch?
Remember what happened when an F-117 crashed during an air show? All the hazards due to the toxic chemicals those airplanes are made of?
January 30th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Red remembers the Cash-Landrum case, which it occurs to me has some similarity to the Maury Island sighting-
also a greatly disputed and intriguing
case.
One of “ours”? Well, I kinda doubt it.
I wouldn’t rule it out completely, but
nothing I’ve read in recent years
suggests we are anywhere near the kind
of aviation technology that these
sightings ( if they are,in fact, craft
at all ) suggest.
January 30th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I’m thinking CARGO craft! Could you imagine a craft the size of that one silently swooping down behind enemy lines and disgorging a battalion of soldiers and tanks. Need two though - gotta feed those girls and boys. Something that size and can also defeat radar would definitely be kept secret!
January 30th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Exactly craig, thanks for the reminder
January 30th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Like most of the laymen out here in the real world, I’m fairly skeptical of the ET hypothesis/explanation for UFO’s . What really bothers me if this is a military aircraft the implied technological advances have been kept secret to keep the status quo in place. The political implications are staggering. Several decades of defense spending and military conflict were literally for maintaining appearances. Think of the thousands of lives lost in unnecessary aircraft crashes or billions of dollars wasted on our current space program. Whatever the truth is about UFO’s, the US gov’t has a serious vested interest in keeping the lid on the secret.
January 31st, 2008 at 4:18 am
When I was serving in the British Military we had a word to desribe ‘Alien’ technolgy, ‘Huujuu’ and this is going back over 20 years ago.
Although I never worked in a particulary secret department or black ops as I think they are refered to now, it was resonably common for the chaps I knew to talk about Huujuu when refering to both sightings by civilians “Theres a lot of Huujuu being talked about after those flares went up last night” and secret technology. At the time it was relied upon that the Harrier jump jet would be wrongly sighted by the public and whilst this was secret the Jet was know as Huujuu technology.
Statistically speaking, my opinion is that what we are seeing is far more likely to be Huujuu than Alien and i would further guess that for reason we are ment to be seeing this technology otherwise it would tested out at sea as it was when I was involved with the military.
January 31st, 2008 at 12:54 pm
I believe crgintx may be onto something.
What makes us believe we know anything about the actual level of secret military technology? After all … isn’t it, well, secret?
With a little imagination, can’t one envision technologies which, if they were generally found even to be possible, might cause real problems for the government? After all, do we actually believe “national security” is the only criterion used for judging such matters as classification – to the exclusion, say, the commercial interests of powerful groups?
January 31st, 2008 at 2:09 pm
One line of speculation that I’ve never quite been able to shake is that the drive to put nuclear powerplants into something that flies must have just been irresistible to the 1950’s military mind. We know about the nuclear rocket and long range bomber programs but I’ve always wondered whether or not those old articles about electrogravitic propulsion inferred a nuclear powerplant.
There is plenty of good evidence in the ufological lore to suggest that serious physical harm in the form of radiation poisoning and burns can befall those who come into close proximity to the objects. There is also the often reported effect of the interference with or failure of a large array of traditional electronic systems.
It seems like you could build a reasonably believable plot line that propulsion advances were made that required nuclear power and that, while hugely advantageous in terms of performance, were accompanies by a wide range of side effect that the world at large would not be comfortable with. I’m not sure what all is involved in the various nuclear treaties we’ve signed but I’m guessing the idea of an atmospheric aircraft with a dirty nuclear power source and potentially harmful atmospheric effects that is also somewhat incompatible with a lot of our traditional technological infrastructure would be quite alarming to a lot of people. How then could you be permitted to develop and operate such a technology?
Not that this even comes close to “explaining” the ufo phenomena but I like it as a spy novel plot.