Dec 15 2006
|
|
Nick’s Pic Of The Day
While attending - and speaking at - the National UFO Conference held in Hollywood in late 2005, I took a stroll around the the town. After seeing, up close and personal, the “starry names” of numerous egotistical actors and those of the anorexic/bulimic girls of reality TV, I took a photo of the only star I considered worth preserving for posterity.  Zilladelic, baby!
Click on image for full size version
This entry was posted
on Friday, December 15th, 2006 at 10:58 am and is filed under Breaking News, The Redfern Files. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit BlinkList Google Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Related News Stories:
- Nick’s Pic Of The Day »
- Nick’s Pic Of The Day »
- Nick’s Pic Of The Day »
- Nick’s Pic Of The Day »
- Nick’s Pic of the Day »
|
|
Contribute Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
December 16th, 2006 at 4:15 pm
Godzilla? You missed the most important star; Flipper. You remember Flipper, don’t you, Nick? Flipper was a popular TV program. Flipper’s got to have a star somewhere there. How could the descendant of the Master ET Race not have a star? Next visit, search harder!
Hey, your Roswell thread doesn’t have any entries yet, so I’ll post a question here. I went back to Stanton Friedman’s review of “Body Snatchers” and read it again. The only salient point I found was that he questioned the reliability of two of your insider sources, specifically, “The Colonel” and “Black Widow”.
Your book is on the way, so don’t spoil any surprises, but I’m curious about Friedman’s objection. How confident are you in the veracity of the information these sources provided you? Were you able to positively verify the identities of these people and/or that they were really in a position to have observed the events they claim to have witnessed? And finally, did you have any way to double check so as to be certain their testimonies were not disinformation, either in full or in part?
December 17th, 2006 at 9:01 am
Raven
As for the identities of the sources and their positions in the military and Intelligence world - this definitely checks out.
So, in that respect, they are who the claim to be.
But as far as the data is concerned that they related: I personally think that they have been honest with me.
But, the problem with Roswell (for proponents of _any_ theories), is that it’s so long ago and there are _zero_ files available on the case.
Today, I kind of make a parallel between books on Roswell and books on Jack the Ripper.
Both cases are so long ago, everyone’s dead, the hard documents that might proven anything are absent. Officials (who might know something) deny all the conspiracy theories; and so it’s left up to authors and researchers to try and gauge how accurate the info given to us is.
So, everyone is reliant upon the memories of old timers saying this or saying that.
As you’ve ordered the book, I won’t discuss all the details of the book until you have read it and we can discuss in-depth then.
But, I feel that their accounts hang together. I’m still digging into the story and have other stories now from various other old timers telling similar stories.
December 18th, 2006 at 11:28 am
Just as a curiosity, I presume you’re familiar with the SERPO website and its content. Do you place any stock in the material that’s been released to date, and, if so, has that changed your view at all on Roswell?
December 18th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Yes, I’m very familiar with Serpo.
Frankly, I’m convinced it’s disinfo. One theory that has been doing the rounds at an underground level is that Serpo is disinfo circulated by the Intel world to try and “fish out” certain ufologists who may be (or may _have_ been) in the employ of overseas intelligence agencies.
In other words, the Government puts out this faked story, see who gets involved with it, and then see who they are talking to: are they talking just with fellow ufologists? Or are they having lunch on a regular basis from someone from the Russian Embassy?
If the latter, no real secrets get compromised; and what may evolve into an intelligence leak of real data in the future gets cut off before it actively begins.
Of course, I may be wrong and the documents are the real thing!
I thought that the comments about Alice Bradley Sheldon/ James Tiptree being the author of Serpo was an intersting one.
If you haven’t seen this thread, do a Google search on Sheldon/Tiptree + Serpo and you’ll see some intriguing things…