<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gorightly on Roswell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/gorightly-on-roswell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/gorightly-on-roswell/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdventureMan</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/gorightly-on-roswell/#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>AdventureMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/gorightly-on-roswell/#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>I sympathize with this view so very completely.

My own source has just as solid military credentials as any of those relating to the Roswell dogma and he has insisted for thirty (30) years that the craft was NOT extraterrestrial nor were the bodies.

UFOlogy has been as stick-assed as mainstream science on this issue, and I feel it's mostly to sell books and speaking engagements and DVDs, just as academia refuses to teach anything other than outdated dogma because the professors have houses to pay for and textbooks to sell. 

There have been dissenting voices for decades who generally end up walking away from the field because of the narrow vision of those who populate it and control the channels of communication. The mistake in letting these voices go silent is that we lose what can be gained from fresh perspectives.

I know I'll be ignored by a lot of these people because I'm the 'asshole' who agrees Roswell was NOT an extraterrestrial event. It wasn't crash-test dummies, it wasn't balloons, but it wasn't Zeta Reticulans either. There is more history supporting the non-ET hypothesis than there is to support the ET dogma, but it's not the currently popular idea.

For the record, I believe ET exists. There is a TON of historical evidence for it. I'm saying Roswell was NOT an ET issue. I'm saying the the truth is so much more than just ET.

Like Vallee said, our world is just a subset of something bigger...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sympathize with this view so very completely.</p>
<p>My own source has just as solid military credentials as any of those relating to the Roswell dogma and he has insisted for thirty (30) years that the craft was NOT extraterrestrial nor were the bodies.</p>
<p>UFOlogy has been as stick-assed as mainstream science on this issue, and I feel it&#8217;s mostly to sell books and speaking engagements and DVDs, just as academia refuses to teach anything other than outdated dogma because the professors have houses to pay for and textbooks to sell. </p>
<p>There have been dissenting voices for decades who generally end up walking away from the field because of the narrow vision of those who populate it and control the channels of communication. The mistake in letting these voices go silent is that we lose what can be gained from fresh perspectives.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ll be ignored by a lot of these people because I&#8217;m the &#8216;asshole&#8217; who agrees Roswell was NOT an extraterrestrial event. It wasn&#8217;t crash-test dummies, it wasn&#8217;t balloons, but it wasn&#8217;t Zeta Reticulans either. There is more history supporting the non-ET hypothesis than there is to support the ET dogma, but it&#8217;s not the currently popular idea.</p>
<p>For the record, I believe ET exists. There is a TON of historical evidence for it. I&#8217;m saying Roswell was NOT an ET issue. I&#8217;m saying the the truth is so much more than just ET.</p>
<p>Like Vallee said, our world is just a subset of something bigger&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
