<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortean Essentials!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/fortean-essentials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/fortean-essentials/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mouseonmoon</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/fortean-essentials/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>mouseonmoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1496#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>"For every five people who read Charles Fort, four will go insane," Ben Hecht wrote  (in the Chicago Daily News review) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For every five people who read Charles Fort, four will go insane,&#8221; Ben Hecht wrote  (in the Chicago Daily News review) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew hempel</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/fortean-essentials/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>drew hempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1496#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>Admittedly the last new release of the complete works in one edition bowled me over.  I didn't reread LO! (since I had already read it 3 times).  I did read Wild Talents and New Lands but not as with much scrutiny as I had hoped -- more like straggling along past the text.  In that recent Tarcher edition, the editor (whose new biography of Fort I did read in detail) recommended NOT reading Book of the Damned first even though it was Fort's first book.  He argued that the style was too jarring -- not enough prose and too philosophical.  I disagree -- I still think Book of the Damned is the best because Fort lays down his foundation, a broadside against science as a whole and even inductive and deductive reasoning.  Fort's method relies on induction (which most people latch onto so that it leads more to a listing of information) but Book of the Damned goes beyond that to logical inference of the source of reality.

Anyway glad to see there's a large print edition since it's dangerous to pack too much Fort in such a small area:  Spontaneous Human Combustion is the obvious Fortean result.  I look forward to another run for my money (better than trying to get the new high score in Donkey Kong!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admittedly the last new release of the complete works in one edition bowled me over.  I didn&#8217;t reread LO! (since I had already read it 3 times).  I did read Wild Talents and New Lands but not as with much scrutiny as I had hoped &#8212; more like straggling along past the text.  In that recent Tarcher edition, the editor (whose new biography of Fort I did read in detail) recommended NOT reading Book of the Damned first even though it was Fort&#8217;s first book.  He argued that the style was too jarring &#8212; not enough prose and too philosophical.  I disagree &#8212; I still think Book of the Damned is the best because Fort lays down his foundation, a broadside against science as a whole and even inductive and deductive reasoning.  Fort&#8217;s method relies on induction (which most people latch onto so that it leads more to a listing of information) but Book of the Damned goes beyond that to logical inference of the source of reality.</p>
<p>Anyway glad to see there&#8217;s a large print edition since it&#8217;s dangerous to pack too much Fort in such a small area:  Spontaneous Human Combustion is the obvious Fortean result.  I look forward to another run for my money (better than trying to get the new high score in Donkey Kong!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
