UFOMystic » ET Revelations

A former registered nurse who has worked with hundreds of clients, including many children, will be revealing evidence of their encounters with extraterrestrial beings at an upcoming conference in Montreal, Canada.

After a decade of research as a professional counsellor and clinical hypnotherapist, Australia’s Mary Rodwell says that there is now enough evidence to conclude that these “beings” appear to come from other planets and other dimensions parallel to our own.

For more of this story, click here.

8 Comments to “ET Revelations”

Annie Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 7:14 am

Very interesting article, I’m glad this is becoming more public. I just wonder exactly what is happening to these children, do they experience lost time, or do they remember everything. If they don’t, can’t they be put under hypnosis?

alanborky Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 7:45 am

“An eight year old has called her downloading of information ‘knowledge bombs’, as complex data conveyed through mental images and concepts”.

Whoa!!!

That’s exactly what it’s like!!!

It’s like as if someone was to chuck a mini atomic bomb at a garbage mountain but instead of vapourising it, or reducing it to tiny bits strewn over a very wide area, it causes the garbage to reassemble itself into a sort of even more intelligent hybrid of everything going on in ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’.

Only, for ‘garbage’ read ‘mind’.

Nick Redfern Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 10:38 am

Annie

I would think that these kids *could* be hypnotised, but the bigger question is: *should* they be hypnotised?

I have to say that I have sat in on 2 hypnosis sessions undertaken by people with no formal training and whose expertise in hypnosis came from reading books on the subject.

This is very reckless. More importantly, I have seen on both occasions examples of (albeit unintentional) leading of the subject.

One, for example, I can cite almost word for word from memory. The interviewee asked the person under hypnosis something like: “Did the aliens have the usual large black eyes and big head?”

Well, the interviewer was certainly sincere, but asking a question in that fashion instills in the mind of the interviewee that these things are (a) alien; (b) have large black eyes; and (c) have big heads.

It’s rather like me saying to you: “Annie, do not - under any circumstances - think of a pink colored elephant.” If I say that, you cannot fail to think of it - even though I’m asking the oppostite of you.

And that’s the problem I have with abductions and hypnosis. While I am convinced that there is a real abduction puzzle, I’m not sure that hypnosis is the right way to resolve it when certain players in the subject have not a clue about the right way to use hypnosis as a valuable tool - and in a fashion that does not plant (again, unwittingly) imagery in the mind of the person under hypnosis.

Because then, we’re not sure how many of those memories are *real* and how many are driven by the questions asked.

That’s a necessarily condensed explanation on my concerns, but I think they are valid ones.

raeleggett Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 12:25 pm

Given the known mutability of human memory, and the unrelibility of eyewitness testimony in the first place, a lot of investigators might as well be interviewing themselves.

A completely new methodology is needed, but I have no clue what it should be.

Nick Redfern Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 2:09 pm

Raeleggett:

I agree. Particularly in abduction stories, researchers are almost conditioned to expect a story of little gray men with black eyes and large heads extracting DNA.

Maybe they are.

But conducting an investigation with a pre-conceived notion of what to expect and what to find (whether consciously or unconsciously) is a fatal mistake.

How we correct things I’m not sure, as expectation and belief are human traits.

But I do know that many of the methods employed to investigate abductions are seriously flawed.

Doesn’t mean nothing is going on (I’m firmly convinced that something weird *is* afoot re abductions); but it does mean that some investigators are their own worst enemy because they aren’t trained in the areas that they delve into.

DingoDog99 Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 7:38 pm

Nick,

along these lines have you seen this extremely odd magazine the “NICAP” guys have put out? Some interesting reading in the least.

http://www.nicap.org/JAR_page.htm

Jess

DingoDog99 Says:
May 16th, 2007 at 7:40 pm

Strangley nothing I try to post seems to make it to the web site.

One more try… Have you seen this?

http://www.nicap.org/JAR_page.htm

Jess

Nick Redfern Says:
May 17th, 2007 at 5:41 am

Jess