<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deceptive Messengers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/deceptive-messengers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/deceptive-messengers/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BenDoverEsq.</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/deceptive-messengers/#comment-6557</link>
		<dc:creator>BenDoverEsq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1452#comment-6557</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, I've been checking out the Blogsquatcher pretty regularly since the BF story broke. Anyway, he made a update to a post that mentioned you:
"LATE EDIT: I was briefly on the radio show -- called in to ask an impertinent question about the similarity between the mask and the head in the freezer. The show is ongoing for another 15 minutes so I'm still listening.
Nick just said something simple but profound, and here's a near quote - - right now all we have are opinions, and opinions are fine, but opinions don't solve anything. The only thing that will solve it is evidence.
I don't mind admitting that I felt like a schoolkid being on the radio with Nick.."
I guess he's a fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, I&#8217;ve been checking out the Blogsquatcher pretty regularly since the BF story broke. Anyway, he made a update to a post that mentioned you:<br />
&#8220;LATE EDIT: I was briefly on the radio show &#8212; called in to ask an impertinent question about the similarity between the mask and the head in the freezer. The show is ongoing for another 15 minutes so I&#8217;m still listening.<br />
Nick just said something simple but profound, and here&#8217;s a near quote - - right now all we have are opinions, and opinions are fine, but opinions don&#8217;t solve anything. The only thing that will solve it is evidence.<br />
I don&#8217;t mind admitting that I felt like a schoolkid being on the radio with Nick..&#8221;<br />
I guess he&#8217;s a fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Redfern</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/deceptive-messengers/#comment-6555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1452#comment-6555</guid>
		<description>Hey Helgarde:
It's basically the same text, but it does contain a new 2-page foreword from Vallee for the new edition. Yeah, if your original is like mine, it's good to have a back-up in case the other one does finally fall apart! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Helgarde:<br />
It&#8217;s basically the same text, but it does contain a new 2-page foreword from Vallee for the new edition. Yeah, if your original is like mine, it&#8217;s good to have a back-up in case the other one does finally fall apart! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helgarde</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/deceptive-messengers/#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator>Helgarde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1452#comment-6538</guid>
		<description>Nick, is there any new material in this edition? I have a copy of the first edition and also read it every few years. I agree with you that it is probably the clearest presentation of Vallee's theories regarding UFOs and their effect on popular culture and society. 

I just want to know if I should go ahead and get a copy of this edition as well--and maybe I should even if there is no new material contained therein, because my old copy is about to fall apart....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, is there any new material in this edition? I have a copy of the first edition and also read it every few years. I agree with you that it is probably the clearest presentation of Vallee&#8217;s theories regarding UFOs and their effect on popular culture and society. </p>
<p>I just want to know if I should go ahead and get a copy of this edition as well&#8211;and maybe I should even if there is no new material contained therein, because my old copy is about to fall apart&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
