May 07 2007
|
|
A Moon Conspiracy?
Now here’s an intriguing story that is bound to raise a few interesting questions and observations:
Mankind’s second race for the moon took on a distinctly Cold War feel yesterday when the Russian space agency accused its old rival NASA of rejecting a proposal for joint lunar exploration.The claim comes amid suspicion in Moscow that the United States is seeking to deny Russia access to an isotope in abundance under the moon’s surface that many believe could replace fossil fuels and even end the threat of global warming.
Click here for the rest of the story.
This entry was posted
on Monday, May 7th, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under Breaking News, Conspiracies, Government Projects, The Redfern Files, UFOlogy. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit BlinkList Google Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Related News Stories:
- Pravda on UFOs… »
- Flying Saucer Music #16 »
- Devon UFOs… »
- Square Craters On The Moon »
- Kenn, Kirby & Conspiracies »
- From the UFO Archives (Part 4) »
- Nick’s Pic of the Day »
- Comedian Joe Rogan on UFOs »
- The Secrets of Titan »
- Flying Saucer Music #15 »
|
|
Contribute Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
May 8th, 2007 at 10:48 am
Very, Very Interesting!
May 8th, 2007 at 11:29 am
Nick, setting aside a whole host of other issues where NASA probably IS guilty of duplicity, and maybe even the odd conspiracy or two, I suspect the real story behind this one is ultimately budgetary concerns.
They’re possibly simply terrified some bookkeeper somewhere might figure out if NASA started sharing their workload with other space agencies their running costs could be lowered and ultimately their budget slashed.
Having said that, I reckon you’ve touched on the next great societal ‘atomic bomb’ with this story, especially when you factor in parallel stories like the latest revivification of ‘Cold Fusion’ one.
It definitely seems like somewhere not too far down the line there’s a prospect of energy becoming so cheap and universally abundant it’ll be practically free.
The trouble with that scenario of course is if it’s allowed to happen, the present form of what passes for Capitalism’ll probably collapse quicker than the Berlin Wall.
In which case it’ll be ‘hilarious’ to watch all the industry type spokespeople currently denouncing the ‘hysteria’ over the ‘myth’ of global warming suddenly declaring not only is global warming a deadly and pressing reality but justification for creating a carefully controlled and highly regulated energy market to ensure the general public’s access to and usage of it is strictly limited.
I imagine something modelled on the lines of the present restrictions imposed on the diamond market’d probably just about cover it, but envisage coalitions of strange new bedfellows as pro-Evolutionary scientist types’d suddenly start manning the barricades, uniting with the likes of fundamentalist Christians and Muslims in protest at it, while yet other scientist and fundamentalist types denounced them for their blindness to sheer necessity.
Eek! Maybe it’s just me but it almost seems like only two options lay ahead of humanity at the moment - Heaven or Hell, and nothing in between.
May 8th, 2007 at 11:51 am
Alan:
Yeah I can easily imagine a situation where something else becomes the “next petrol” and we are charged an arm and a leg for it by industry scum.
Heaven or Hell? Nah, mate: oblivion. Lights out.