Oct 28 2009
|
|
How Long is a UFO?
From today’s Anomalist, and which may be of interest:
How Long Is A UFO? The Big Study. Says CUFOS UFOlogist Mike Swords: “I am not sanguine about the odds on us discovering these hard-wired patterns that many UFOlogists have sought as the ‘holy grail.’ But, one wonders if there are not much subtler patterns, or at least ‘fingerprints’ of the agenda operators which can be found. This post is about a rare case of such a find…” The “long” in the title refers to the length of the UFO experience. The data show that reports that turn out to be IFOs are far different in terms of the length of the experience than true UFO experiences.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, October 28th, 2009 at 7:13 am and is filed under Alien Encounters, Anomalous Phenomena, Breaking News, Close Encounters, Evidence, Eyewitness Accounts, The Redfern Files, UFO Sightings, UFOlogists, UFOlogy. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response or trackback from your site.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit BlinkList Google Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Related News Stories:
- Look Out Above! »
- UFO Audio »
- Mothman and Michelin Man… »
- The CARET Phenomenon, Continued »
- The UFO Con-Man »
- Crop Circle Latest »
- Long Beach UFOs »
- An Alien Shoot-Out? »
- An Alien Corpse »
- Pioneers of Space »
|
|
Contribute Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
October 29th, 2009 at 5:37 am
*Scratching his head* So let me get this straight: the conclusion proposed by the author is, that the only qualitative aspect of the UFO experience that would make sense to chart, is how nonsensical the event was?
It is interesting to consider, certainly. Although I would have preferred if the charts were presented in a more um… professional manner? Not as if they were drawn by a 10-year-old —which is kind of ironic, considering most grade-school students are pretty proficient with Excell by now
November 1st, 2009 at 5:50 am
Nick — what’s your take on Stan Deyo? I was watching all the new “black triangle” vids on youtube — and there’s tons! As you know I had a close encounter with a triangle back in 1997 and I just got my hands on the old newspaper clips from the mass sighting in my area back in late March, early April, 1978.
Anyway Stan Deyo says that they are triangles because of the spin vortex of gravity — counterdirectional — is stablized through the geometry of the triangle. Then hydrogen plasma surrounds the spin vortices to power them.
Sure enough 2007 Aviation and Tech Weekly has a “From Shock waves to Stars” article on Ed Teller. Stan Deyo says he was recruited by Ed Teller for his magnetohydrodynamic propulsion research, in parallel with the nuclear propulsion research.
You can go on youtube for “Stan Deyo and Antigravity” and the “cosmic conspiracy” 1970s documentary in on there as well.
So these latest black triangle vids show the whole craft being subsumed in a sphere of light and one vid shows the acceleration super-fast!!
I posted it on my blog naturalresonancerevolution.blogspot
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:27 am
Drew:
To be honest, I don’t actually know much at all about Deyo, but I’ll take a look at his online stuff.
Nick
November 3rd, 2009 at 3:10 am
I looked at some Deyo vids on Youtube last night. Interesting stuff, but I really wish the man would show something more than bubbles in Coke bottles, in order to prove his claims :-/
November 5th, 2009 at 11:27 am
rpj — here’s the MHD patent for propulsion. Still I found his modular triangle explanation fascinating as per “how LONG” is a ufo!
J.F. King, US Patent 3,322,374 (7 pages). “Magnetohydrodynamic Propulsion Apparatus.” Filed Sep. 30, 1964, granted May 30, 1967.