Comments on: Roswell: An Interview http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/05/01/roswell-theirs-or-ours/ UFO News, Views, and More Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:27:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: The_Sage http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/05/01/roswell-theirs-or-ours/#comment-8817 The_Sage Sat, 02 May 2009 22:48:41 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1902#comment-8817 Sage: Despite what some think, we DO agree now and again! :)" I apologize...I won't let it happen again :) Sage: Despite what some think, we DO agree now and again! :)”

I apologize…I won’t let it happen again
:)

]]> By: Nick Redfern http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/05/01/roswell-theirs-or-ours/#comment-8811 Nick Redfern Sat, 02 May 2009 09:34:52 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1902#comment-8811 Sage: Despite what some think, we DO agree now and again! :) RPJ: Yep, you could easily read the Darklore piece first, as it provides a summary of the book anyway. Re the PM article: it could indeed be a Serpo type thing, and I've never denied that. However, as I have mentioned before, introducing yet another cover story only invites more suspicion that Mogul and the Dummies were covers - which has the effect of having people investigate Roswell more, which (to me) seems counter-productive. There's one other facet that I think is worth commenting on: namely, that of the people I interviewed, a couple of them actually new very little - just snippets. So, it wasn't like I was being fed some hugely intricate tale by those 2. Rather, it was just recollections of what they were told. To me, that doesn't sound like some intricate Serpo/MJ12 type story. But, Roswell is most definitely a hall of mirrors!! Sage:
Despite what some think, we DO agree now and again!
:)

RPJ:
Yep, you could easily read the Darklore piece first, as it provides a summary of the book anyway.

Re the PM article: it could indeed be a Serpo type thing, and I’ve never denied that.

However, as I have mentioned before, introducing yet another cover story only invites more suspicion that Mogul and the Dummies were covers - which has the effect of having people investigate Roswell more, which (to me) seems counter-productive.

There’s one other facet that I think is worth commenting on: namely, that of the people I interviewed, a couple of them actually new very little - just snippets.

So, it wasn’t like I was being fed some hugely intricate tale by those 2. Rather, it was just recollections of what they were told.

To me, that doesn’t sound like some intricate Serpo/MJ12 type story.
But, Roswell is most definitely a hall of mirrors!!

]]> By: The_Sage http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/05/01/roswell-theirs-or-ours/#comment-8808 The_Sage Fri, 01 May 2009 17:27:22 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1902#comment-8808 "the fact is there will be truly massive disillusionment within ufology if Roswell falls. In fact, I do not even believe that the ETH will survive within modern-day ufology if Roswell falls - the stakes reallly are that high, in my opinion. But, so what? At the end of the day, it shouldn't matter if the "good old days" of ufology vanish. Getting the truth is all that should matter" And the congregation says, "Amen". “the fact is there will be truly massive disillusionment within ufology if Roswell falls. In fact, I do not even believe that the ETH will survive within modern-day ufology if Roswell falls - the stakes reallly are that high, in my opinion. But, so what? At the end of the day, it shouldn’t matter if the “good old days” of ufology vanish. Getting the truth is all that should matter”

And the congregation says, “Amen”.

]]> By: red pill junkie http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/05/01/roswell-theirs-or-ours/#comment-8806 red pill junkie Fri, 01 May 2009 15:37:09 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1902#comment-8806 I remember reading that PM article you refer to —must still have it somewhere amid a mountain of old mags. What troubles me is that the new information you received appeared 7 years after the article. So, could it be that what you were told was a spin of the hypothesis proposed by PM, the same way that SERPO was a spin of common UFO lore? Anyway, I can't wait to read your Darklore article ...although I must confess something: I haven't read your Bodysnatchers of the Desert yet —mea culpa!— although it's on my Amazon wish list; would you suggest postponing the reading of your Darklore article, or it won't spoil it if I read it before Body Snatchers? I remember reading that PM article you refer to —must still have it somewhere amid a mountain of old mags.

What troubles me is that the new information you received appeared 7 years after the article. So, could it be that what you were told was a spin of the hypothesis proposed by PM, the same way that SERPO was a spin of common UFO lore?

Anyway, I can’t wait to read your Darklore article …although I must confess something: I haven’t read your Bodysnatchers of the Desert yet —mea culpa!— although it’s on my Amazon wish list; would you suggest postponing the reading of your Darklore article, or it won’t spoil it if I read it before Body Snatchers?

]]>