Comments on: Journal Of Scientific Exploration

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:43:29 +0000

tyder,

Thank you. I’ve been accused of both attitudes, so I guess it’s good.

By: tyder001

tyder001 — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:45:22 +0000

Yep! I been lurking. I read Project Beta (think I have the name right)some time ago and then found this website. I look often for the links and stories you and Nick put up. You seem to be a solid researcher and neither a open true beleiver or a hardened atheist. I also think Paul Kimball does a great job. Scuse muh spellin of names and stuff but I often write on the fly. Thanks for the work you do.

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:21:38 +0000

tyder,

I don’t know if you’ve been lurking or what up to now, since I don’t recall your handle in previous replies, but welcome to the fold!

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:20:11 +0000

RPJ,

Thanks for the heads-up on the article. I’ll read it today.

By: tyder001

tyder001 — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:07:29 +0000

Thanks for the link. It’s a gold mine and I’ve long been interested in “serious” research into reincarnation and out of body experiences.

By: red pill junkie

red pill junkie — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:45:34 +0000

Hey Greg,

totally unrelated, but have you read the recent LA Times article about area 51?

Here’s an excerpt:

“As for the myths of reverse engineering of flying saucers, Barnes offers some insight: “We did reverse engineer a lot of foreign technology, including the Soviet MiG fighter jet out at the Area”—even though the MiG wasn’t shaped like a flying saucer. As for the underground-tunnel talk, that, too, was born of truth. Barnes worked on a nuclear-rocket program called Project NERVA, inside underground chambers at Jackass Flats, in Area 51’s backyard. “Three test-cell facilities were connected by railroad, but everything else was underground,” he says.”

Looking forward for your comments on this!