<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mute Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/13/mute-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/13/mute-evidence/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris obrien</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/13/mute-evidence/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator>chris obrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1815#comment-8431</guid>
		<description>I've checked around on this case and obtained a number of photographs of the animal. Obviously, nothing conclusive can be determined from simply looking at pictures, but to my eye (over 200 cases investigated) it doesn't appear high-strange. Close-ups don't show any cut hair follicles and there isn't that tell-tale mandible incision. David ZPerkins investigated the '95 case and found out that the rancher was considered to be "a goofball" in the community. There may have been another case on Mar 17 that also was questionable Both reports are equivocal case at best... Of course, just my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve checked around on this case and obtained a number of photographs of the animal. Obviously, nothing conclusive can be determined from simply looking at pictures, but to my eye (over 200 cases investigated) it doesn&#8217;t appear high-strange. Close-ups don&#8217;t show any cut hair follicles and there isn&#8217;t that tell-tale mandible incision. David ZPerkins investigated the &#8216;95 case and found out that the rancher was considered to be &#8220;a goofball&#8221; in the community. There may have been another case on Mar 17 that also was questionable Both reports are equivocal case at best&#8230; Of course, just my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
