<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ray Stanford Interview (Pt.2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-9520</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-9520</guid>
		<description>Ed,

I didn't forget that. I suppose I could have asked him what changed his mind from space brothers to a more analytical view, but I think that was obvious from what he said in the interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t forget that. I suppose I could have asked him what changed his mind from space brothers to a more analytical view, but I think that was obvious from what he said in the interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed V.</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-9519</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-9519</guid>
		<description>Greg,

Maybe it's my imagination but you seemed almost relieved when Ray commented on the episode with Adamski. What you might be forgetting is that Ray Stanford IS one of the early contactees. Nowdays he focuses much more on science but he made a number of UFO and psychic claims back in the day highly similar to what people like Van Tassel and Adamski did. You can easily find that information on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s my imagination but you seemed almost relieved when Ray commented on the episode with Adamski. What you might be forgetting is that Ray Stanford IS one of the early contactees. Nowdays he focuses much more on science but he made a number of UFO and psychic claims back in the day highly similar to what people like Van Tassel and Adamski did. You can easily find that information on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-9444</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-9444</guid>
		<description>Ed,

I have a lesser opinion of the veracity of most of the contactees' stories than you seem to have, but that doesn't make them less interesting to me, and it doesn't mean that at least some of them didn't have some sort of genuine contact with extra-human intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>I have a lesser opinion of the veracity of most of the contactees&#8217; stories than you seem to have, but that doesn&#8217;t make them less interesting to me, and it doesn&#8217;t mean that at least some of them didn&#8217;t have some sort of genuine contact with extra-human intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed V.</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-9435</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-9435</guid>
		<description>"Greg Bishop Says: 
March 11th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
RPJ,

I asked about Menger. Ray had a pretty standard â€œHe was faking everything, but his heart was in the right placeâ€ opinion."

What a surprise! I listened to part 1 yesterday and it's amazing how many times Ray Stanford reaches a negative conclusion about the early contactees. And since he had UFO and physic experiences of his own makes me wonder if he's not suffering from "the Billy Meier / I'm the only righteous one syndrome.'
Ray gives some credit to Truman Betherum where there's a collaborating and intriquing story yet is seemingly totally unaware that similar bizarre encounters transpired in the Adamski and Menger cases. Researchers such as C.A. Honey, Bill Hamilton and Timothy Good set off to investigate Adamski and had intriquing encounters as well which they subsequently reported in their books or articles.
Personally I find the early contactees very fascinating and my opinion is that there's more then meets the eye. Sadly, Ray Stanford's field of vision seems to be somewhat narrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Greg Bishop Says:<br />
March 11th, 2009 at 12:12 pm<br />
RPJ,</p>
<p>I asked about Menger. Ray had a pretty standard â€œHe was faking everything, but his heart was in the right placeâ€ opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a surprise! I listened to part 1 yesterday and it&#8217;s amazing how many times Ray Stanford reaches a negative conclusion about the early contactees. And since he had UFO and physic experiences of his own makes me wonder if he&#8217;s not suffering from &#8220;the Billy Meier / I&#8217;m the only righteous one syndrome.&#8217;<br />
Ray gives some credit to Truman Betherum where there&#8217;s a collaborating and intriquing story yet is seemingly totally unaware that similar bizarre encounters transpired in the Adamski and Menger cases. Researchers such as C.A. Honey, Bill Hamilton and Timothy Good set off to investigate Adamski and had intriquing encounters as well which they subsequently reported in their books or articles.<br />
Personally I find the early contactees very fascinating and my opinion is that there&#8217;s more then meets the eye. Sadly, Ray Stanford&#8217;s field of vision seems to be somewhat narrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris obrien</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8432</link>
		<dc:creator>chris obrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8432</guid>
		<description>Ray Stanford stands head &#38; shoulders above the field. I've managed to record over 25 hours of interviews with him and have written down his UFOlogical life story ()in his own words) that is way beyond fascinating. Talk about helping design the tee-shirt factory! His observational skills and visual awareness are second to none. His skills at finding new dinosaur species and gathering together the world's largest private collection of dino tracks (all inside the beltway in MD!) indicate this is a man with off-the-scale awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray Stanford stands head &amp; shoulders above the field. I&#8217;ve managed to record over 25 hours of interviews with him and have written down his UFOlogical life story ()in his own words) that is way beyond fascinating. Talk about helping design the tee-shirt factory! His observational skills and visual awareness are second to none. His skills at finding new dinosaur species and gathering together the world&#8217;s largest private collection of dino tracks (all inside the beltway in MD!) indicate this is a man with off-the-scale awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8364</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8364</guid>
		<description>RPJ,

I asked about Menger. Ray had a pretty standard "He was faking everything, but his heart was in the right place" opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RPJ,</p>
<p>I asked about Menger. Ray had a pretty standard &#8220;He was faking everything, but his heart was in the right place&#8221; opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8363</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8363</guid>
		<description>N-A,

I asked that question! Thanks. The show should be up by next week. The server is going wonky right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N-A,</p>
<p>I asked that question! Thanks. The show should be up by next week. The server is going wonky right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not_anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>not_anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8352</guid>
		<description>When will this be up on radiomysterio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will this be up on radiomysterio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red pill junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8331</link>
		<dc:creator>red pill junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8331</guid>
		<description>All right!!

You should also ask him about his impressions of the late Howard Menger.

And about Fatima!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right!!</p>
<p>You should also ask him about his impressions of the late Howard Menger.</p>
<p>And about Fatima!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not_anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2009/03/05/ray-stanford-interview-pt2/#comment-8329</link>
		<dc:creator>not_anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1795#comment-8329</guid>
		<description>Whatever people think of Stanford you can't say that this guy didn't follow through.  He seems like the ufo nerd's nerd and I mean that in the best possible way.

I would love to hear you get him to talk about what directions he would take instrumented research today given the technology now available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever people think of Stanford you can&#8217;t say that this guy didn&#8217;t follow through.  He seems like the ufo nerd&#8217;s nerd and I mean that in the best possible way.</p>
<p>I would love to hear you get him to talk about what directions he would take instrumented research today given the technology now available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
