Comments on: 140 Years of UFO Photographs

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:39:28 +0000

crg,

I couldn’t see anything recognizable in that photo. Maybe I’m not looking closely enough.

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:38:27 +0000

Greg T.

I’ll be sure to email you with a couple of ideas. Thanks!

By: crgintx

crgintx — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:53:02 +0000

The photos prior to 1930 are especially intriguing as monoplanes were especially rare until the early ’30’s. As someone once said, ‘why are some ufo’s always looking like aircraft from two-decades later. The 1870 photo definitely looks like an airship from the early 1900’s.

By: Greg Taylor

Greg Taylor — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:13:32 +0000

Good point about the stars Greg B. And of course you’re more than welcome for Darklore #3 - I think I emailed you about #1 originally, but never got a reply from you. Or perhaps that’s an embedded memory from my alien overlords.

Send me an email with any thoughts you have for a contribution to #3. We need a couple of Gregs, there’s been far too many Michaels in the first couple of issues!

Kind regards,
Greg T.

By: Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:21:12 +0000

Greg T,

Could be, but the stars aren’t moving. Perhaps this could have been done with a double exposure. Good catch.

P.S. Am I invited to the next Darklore issue?

Greg B.

By: Greg Taylor

Greg Taylor — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:54:07 +0000

Hi Greg B.

Wondering if that captioned image at the top of your post might be multiple exposures of a crescent moon? What do you think?

Kind regards,
Greg T.