<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sacred Sites and the Unknown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/07/18/sacred-sites-and-the-unknown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/07/18/sacred-sites-and-the-unknown/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: red pill junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/07/18/sacred-sites-and-the-unknown/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>red pill junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1391#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"Will any of today’s “starchitecture” end up being sacred?"&lt;/i&gt;

Well, Sir Norman Foster's &lt;i&gt;Gherkin&lt;/i&gt;, with its phallic proportions, might give our descendants the &lt;b&gt;wrong&lt;/b&gt; idea ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Will any of today’s “starchitecture” end up being sacred?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well, Sir Norman Foster&#8217;s <i>Gherkin</i>, with its phallic proportions, might give our descendants the <b>wrong</b> idea <img src='http://www.ufomystic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euphemystic</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/07/18/sacred-sites-and-the-unknown/#comment-6264</link>
		<dc:creator>euphemystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/?p=1391#comment-6264</guid>
		<description>I think it's the lazy and developmentally incapable who look to the past for magical solutions from archaeology, not that strange things don't happen at such romantic places.

Who's to say that today's sacred sites aren't being formed by enlightened people coming together for a specific purpose in places like open plan offices, industrial parks, etc?  On the other hand there's that giant Maitrea Buddha in India in the planning stages.  It's not like people have ever stopped making these kinds of things.  Will any of today's "starchitecture" end up being sacred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s the lazy and developmentally incapable who look to the past for magical solutions from archaeology, not that strange things don&#8217;t happen at such romantic places.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s to say that today&#8217;s sacred sites aren&#8217;t being formed by enlightened people coming together for a specific purpose in places like open plan offices, industrial parks, etc?  On the other hand there&#8217;s that giant Maitrea Buddha in India in the planning stages.  It&#8217;s not like people have ever stopped making these kinds of things.  Will any of today&#8217;s &#8220;starchitecture&#8221; end up being sacred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
