Comments on: This Probably Has Nothing To Do With UFOs, But… http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/ UFO News, Views, and More Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:01:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: drew hempel http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5963 drew hempel Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:54:00 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5963 As a recent survivor of reading most of the Book of the Damned I can attest to Fort's recording of footprints measured as 18 to 20 inches. So I'm guess these were the tall, blonde, stud alien types. Probably, in lieu of Fort, with handle-bar mustaches. As a recent survivor of reading most of the Book of the Damned I can attest to Fort’s recording of footprints measured as 18 to 20 inches.

So I’m guess these were the tall, blonde, stud alien types. Probably, in lieu of Fort, with handle-bar mustaches.

]]> By: red pill junkie http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5916 red pill junkie Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:16:08 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5916 Hey LLP, I'm sure my brother-in-law or my cousin's wife would agree with you —He's ecuadorian, she's peruvian. But you and I know better, right? ;-) All jokes aside, I think you're referring to the ruins found in Caral, Peru, that are supposedly 4500 years old or even older; so that would made those pyramids even older than the great pyramid at Giza. Also, there was another news about the oldest example of gold ornamentation, once again from Peru. Who knows, maybe in Mexico there could be older examples of civilization, but you have to keep in mind that there are just so many archeological sites that the government can't neither keep track of all of them, nor give them the propper economical support to preserve them; I aso get depressed when I think of all the many ruins that were probably destroyed in the southeast of Mexico in our craving for oil resources, the olmeca civlization is truly fascinating and full of mysteries. So yes, looking all this in context, its almost as if was a simultaneous development of civilization in both parts of the world. Either that of we have to go back to that infamous "A" word (you all know which one) that's anathema for any serious archeological researcher... for the moment ;-) Hey LLP, I’m sure my brother-in-law or my cousin’s wife would agree with you —He’s ecuadorian, she’s peruvian.

But you and I know better, right? ;-)

All jokes aside, I think you’re referring to the ruins found in Caral, Peru, that are supposedly 4500 years old or even older; so that would made those pyramids even older than the great pyramid at Giza. Also, there was another news about the oldest example of gold ornamentation, once again from Peru.

Who knows, maybe in Mexico there could be older examples of civilization, but you have to keep in mind that there are just so many archeological sites that the government can’t neither keep track of all of them, nor give them the propper economical support to preserve them; I aso get depressed when I think of all the many ruins that were probably destroyed in the southeast of Mexico in our craving for oil resources, the olmeca civlization is truly fascinating and full of mysteries.

So yes, looking all this in context, its almost as if was a simultaneous development of civilization in both parts of the world. Either that of we have to go back to that infamous “A” word (you all know which one) that’s anathema for any serious archeological researcher… for the moment ;-)

]]> By: La Lune Press http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5914 La Lune Press Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:31:05 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5914 The article in the link also says that 44,000 year old remains have been found in Baja California: "a finding that bolsters the notion that people lived throughout the region about 40 millennia ago". What does this have to do with UFO's - well if any happened to be passing, they would have been duly observed by these people 40,000 years ago. So the presence of people in Mexico 40,000 years ago probably means that UFO reports for the "New World" are older than we thought too! Maybe if these people left any cave or rock drawings we could know for sure. P.S. RPJ,I thought the cradle of civilisation was in that was in Peru (or maybe in tunnels underneath Peru/Ecuador). :D The article in the link also says that 44,000 year old remains have been found in Baja California: “a finding that bolsters the notion that people lived throughout the region about 40 millennia ago”.

What does this have to do with UFO’s - well if any happened to be passing, they would have been duly observed by these people 40,000 years ago. So the presence of people in Mexico 40,000 years ago probably means that UFO reports for the “New World” are older than we thought too! Maybe if these people left any cave or rock drawings we could know for sure.

P.S.
RPJ,I thought the cradle of civilisation was in that was in Peru (or maybe in tunnels underneath Peru/Ecuador). :D

]]> By: red pill junkie http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5913 red pill junkie Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:20:06 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5913 Mexico: The REAL craddle of civilization! (<i>A huevo!!</i> LOL) Mexico: The REAL craddle of civilization! (A huevo!! LOL)

]]> By: red pill junkie http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5912 red pill junkie Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:19:08 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5912 It will be very interesting when the "Clovis-first" theory/dogma is finally overthrown by the mounting evidence that seems to prove man reached the "New World" many thousands of years before what was previosuly interpreted. "New World" my foot! :-) It will be very interesting when the “Clovis-first” theory/dogma is finally overthrown by the mounting evidence that seems to prove man reached the “New World” many thousands of years before what was previosuly interpreted.

“New World” my foot! :-)

]]> By: BenDoverEsq. http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5910 BenDoverEsq. Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:25:18 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5910 "What’s this have to do with UFO’s?" HaHa! “What’s this have to do with UFO’s?”
HaHa!

]]> By: craig york http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5909 craig york Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:47:39 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5909 Not a lot, but I agree with Greg, its mighty interesting. One of the things that I gleaned from reading the on-line archives of Wm. Corliss's <i> Science Frontiers</i> newsletter was the slow ( and still incomplete ) collapse of the "No Pre-Clovis Humans in the Americas" pardigm. This is one more nail in that coffin, and helps support claims made for a series of fossils and artifacts found in Northern Mexico no too long ago. What it may say about the dispersal of humanity over the globe, well, still a lot of work to be done there, and given the scarcity of early humanity, its knowledge we may never be certain of... Not a lot, but I agree with Greg, its
mighty interesting. One of the things
that I gleaned from reading the on-line
archives of Wm. Corliss’s Science
Frontiers newsletter was the slow
( and still incomplete ) collapse of
the “No Pre-Clovis Humans in the
Americas” pardigm. This is one more
nail in that coffin, and helps support
claims made for a series of fossils
and artifacts found in Northern Mexico
no too long ago. What it may say about
the dispersal of humanity over the
globe, well, still a lot of work to be
done there, and given the scarcity
of early humanity, its knowledge we
may never be certain of…

]]> By: Adam Gorightly http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5908 Adam Gorightly Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:21:11 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5908 What's this have to do with UFO's? What’s this have to do with UFO’s?

]]> By: euphemystic http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/06/05/prehistoric-footprints-mexico/#comment-5907 euphemystic Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:10:18 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/i-know-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-ufos-but/#comment-5907 There was a theory several years ago about people from northern Australia getting to South America in small boats only to be killed or assimilated by people coming from the north at a much later date. I don't know what became of this idea. There was a theory several years ago about people from northern Australia getting to South America in small boats only to be killed or assimilated by people coming from the north at a much later date. I don’t know what became of this idea.

]]>