Comments on: Friedman: New UFO Book http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/30/friedman-new-ufo-book/ UFO News, Views, and More Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:17:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Stefanos http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/30/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-6947 Stefanos Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:04:07 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-6947 Having read SF's Book, I find its a excellent read in which Stan goes direct to the point without being bogged down by to much technical and mathematical data. Most certainly Stan's experience in dealing with scientific issues allows those of us without the necessary background to view the subject more objectively without being intimidated by mainstream science's limited and biased view of the subject. Interestingly I've recently read Paul Kimble's article in Alien Worlds,the article itself is well written by Paul but i feel its sad that he considers Stan as done a grave disservice to Ufology because of his research as been specific to ETH, unfortunately i feel Paul as done a great disservice to himself with the article in the fact he tells the readership to ignore Stan's comments on interstellar travel, whilst there is a trend to move away from the nuts and bolts flying saucers (which is by no means the definitive explanation to the origin of UFOs)all aspects of the phenomena should be presented to the readership and encouraged in order that a unbiased view of the wider picture maybe be obtained. Having read SF’s Book, I find its a excellent read in which Stan goes direct to the point without being bogged down by to much technical and mathematical data. Most certainly Stan’s experience in dealing with scientific issues allows those of us without the necessary background to view the subject more objectively without being intimidated by mainstream science’s limited and biased view of the subject.
Interestingly I’ve recently read Paul Kimble’s article in Alien Worlds,the article itself is well written by Paul but i feel its sad that he considers Stan as done a grave disservice to Ufology because of his research as been specific to ETH, unfortunately i feel Paul as done a great disservice to himself with the article in the fact he tells the readership to ignore Stan’s comments on interstellar travel, whilst there is a trend to move away from the nuts and bolts flying saucers (which is by no means the definitive explanation to the origin of UFOs)all aspects of the phenomena should be presented to the readership and encouraged in order that a unbiased view of the wider picture maybe be obtained.

]]> By: drew hempel http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/30/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-5855 drew hempel Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:23:39 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-5855 I confess that I'm a stan-alien love-child (part nuclear physicist, part deranged futurist reptilian). I confess that I’m a stan-alien love-child (part nuclear physicist, part deranged futurist reptilian).

]]> By: uv777bk http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/30/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-5851 uv777bk Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:54:11 +0000 http://www.ufomystic.com/the-redfern-files/friedman-new-ufo-book/#comment-5851 Nick, Thanks for keeping us up to date on the book scene. I'd forgot about this release... I just ordered it thanks to your reminder. I also put the new Charles Fort bio on my wish list :) Nick,

Thanks for keeping us up to date on the book scene. I’d forgot about this release… I just ordered it thanks to your reminder.

I also put the new Charles Fort bio on my wish list :)

]]>