<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phoenix Mars Lander Set To Touch Down on Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/</link>
	<description>UFO News, Views, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: red pill junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5764</link>
		<dc:creator>red pill junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5764</guid>
		<description>Well, there's also another good cause for the delays NightFlight: the distance between Earth &#38; Mars (100 million kilometers when they are closest).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s also another good cause for the delays NightFlight: the distance between Earth &amp; Mars (100 million kilometers when they are closest).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NightFlight</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5763</link>
		<dc:creator>NightFlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5763</guid>
		<description>Live? Didn't NASA initiate delays in their live feeds to as much as 40 minutes so that they could airbrush and/or photoshop anomolous images out such as alien craft, aliens, Marvin, etc.? Methinks the only real live feeds are shuttle take-offs and landings. Anyone remember this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live? Didn&#8217;t NASA initiate delays in their live feeds to as much as 40 minutes so that they could airbrush and/or photoshop anomolous images out such as alien craft, aliens, Marvin, etc.? Methinks the only real live feeds are shuttle take-offs and landings. Anyone remember this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>This is what I get for multitasking late at night.

Thanks for the correction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I get for multitasking late at night.</p>
<p>Thanks for the correction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red pill junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>red pill junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... I think disownedsky is right, Greg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I think disownedsky is right, Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disownedsky</title>
		<link>http://www.ufomystic.com/2008/05/21/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5759</link>
		<dc:creator>disownedsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/phoenix-mars-lander-conspiracies/#comment-5759</guid>
		<description>I think you're confusing Mars polar Lander with Mars Climate Orbiter, which is the  mission that had the Newtons/pounds conversion SNAFU (which in my view should be laid squarely at the feet of the JPL nav team).

Mars Polar Lander crashed, but it was a combination of a glitchy landing leg switch, a software bug, and an inadequate test program driven by short schedule and tiny budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing Mars polar Lander with Mars Climate Orbiter, which is the  mission that had the Newtons/pounds conversion SNAFU (which in my view should be laid squarely at the feet of the JPL nav team).</p>
<p>Mars Polar Lander crashed, but it was a combination of a glitchy landing leg switch, a software bug, and an inadequate test program driven by short schedule and tiny budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
