The symbol is a sigil I created embedded within a dharma wheel.

I think that symbols have to speak to us, therefore the symbols I’m talking about have to make sense to humans. If we had a direct connection to the infinite or the divine, we wouldn’t have to represent it in writing.

We might be making a mistake though if we assign a source to the message embedded in any inscrutable mystical symbols as issuing from something we think is important. Channelers often seem to think that they’ve tapped into The Source, only to have their utterings put people to sleep.

PS: So Greg, what kind of Sigil you designed for your tattoo, you rebel?

I’ve always wanted to get a tattoo of the Ollin nahuatl symbol

http://www.cete-sonora.gob.mx/AFDA/cursos/materiales_cd/proyectos/tlacuilos_pergaminos/tlacui3.htm

… but I have been too much of a pussy

The asymmetric resonance is made with “left-hand materials” which violate causality and conservation of energy or the asymmetric resonance is made with longitudinal waves, as with sound waves.

In other words information has now been proven to travel faster than the speed of light. Einstein was wrong.

Raymond Chiao’s experiments are considered to be alchemical because he is transducing energy from gravity waves.

Tesla was doing the same and Tesla insisted on using ONLY sine-waves, just as John Keely used.

The Tai-chi symbol represents this “mandala” of asymmetric sine-wave alchemical resonance but the tantra symbol of the six-sided star can also be achieved from Kepler’s secret symbol — a circle circumscribing and inscribing an equilateral triangle. The reason an equilateral triangle (made up of 10 dots as the Tetrad 1:2:3:4) causes asymmetrical resonance is because the distance between the Numbers are not equal-tempered but instead are complimentary opposites. So again in music the Perfect Fifth is 2:3 as Yang and resonates into the Perfect Fourth, 3:4 as Yin. The natural law of overtones states that this asymmetrical resonance tranduces the whole energy spectrum but the source of the spontaneous symmetry breaking is pure formless awareness or dimensionless knowless, beyond causality, beyond spacetime.

I guess I’m taking it nominally seriously on a level that I find interesting, but like I wrote in the post, extrapolating fron these ideas takes us to places we might not otherwise have explored. Just following the lead of my heroes like Keel, Vallee, Martin Kottmeyer, Dennis Stillings, etc.

You said:

It could also open more questions than answers because it may once more put a dominant role in the observer to the effects observed on reality.

Exactly. This is the sort of thing I was referring to in the reply to Greg T.

It’s unfortunate that Hoagland is percieved as (and probably is) going off the beam quite a lot, becuase if he couched his statements in a “what if” or “consider this” way, he might not be perceived as such. He seems driven to say that each new idea he comes up with is “real” or “true.” I suppose this gets him a much bigger audience, but at the expense of many people who would otherwise take him more seriously.

I agree, it’s a very interesting topic (note my previous discussions of McKenna/DMT and language/logos), and I certainly don’t disparage your commentary. I’d just hate anyone to take this CARET stuff seriously…

Kind regards,
Greg

I know they may “seem” to be copies, but this is why I qualified my statements as an intellectual exercise. Playing with seemingly disparate or even stupid concepts sometimes leads to useful realizations. At least I got to visit a bit with my “old friend,” the sigil.