Thanks Greg, I’m not sure what you mean, if it’s the reference contained within the video then it’s partly because of the amount of people that the Drone sightings & the Isaac documents have drawn to the UFO subject lately, a lot of these people are hanging around still so I thought it a valid reference point.

That and the fact that while I know 100% the Haiti UFO Video is a hoax, I feel that the Isaac documentation can’t (as yet) really be conclusively labelled as a hoax. That’s not to say I think it’s all genuine, but while it may be seen as the same, “Sport” as the Haiti UFO, it’s most certainly the top of an entirely different league!!

But the main reason for mentioning it at all is I feel that it is the benchmark (for the minute anyway) for all comparable UFO sightings/documents. That and to stress the point that the Haiti UFO’s were obviously filmed at the same location (whether that was a CGI environment or not), and why would a member of the public need to lie about this.

Incidentally, on the Haiti UFO’s, the gasp made by the filmmaker has been identified and located online and the software VUE6 has exactly the same rendered backdrop and palms, proving the full incident a complete hoax. (All details at http://www.ufo-blog.com/ufo-blog/2007/08/youtube-haiti-ufo-and-dominican.html)

I hit the wrong button.

My point is that we can refute almost anything that happens as long as it doesn’t happen to us. In fact Christianity and most religious belief is nothing more than that. Belief. The belief is based (more or less) on writings of events that happened. In the 21st century we have video’s, core samples, tons of people working on various space projects,media coverage, and lots of money being poured into highly classified military programs.
But we still have very little common sense.

Thanks for your input re: my questions about the Haiti video and
Walter Haut. Let’s face it, the video
is probably fake, (who knows why), but
regardless of Haut’s lack of memory over a fifty year span, there have certainly been a substantial # of witnesses from that period corroborating events and what they saw.
The problem for me is not so much about the reality of UFO’s, but how easily “experts” dismiss anything that they are not privy too. Videos are one thing, but average people being at a certain place and time are quite another. I reiterate, how many experiences does it take. If we apply science to almost any

The videogrpaher/ hoaxer will probably never come forward, since this is most likely either for attention and/ or internet viral project for reasons we have yet to determine.

Re: Haut’s affadavit-I asked Bill Moore about this. He said that Haut (who he interviewed in 1978, before anyone else) had modified and added many elements of his story. This may be due to faulty memory, but Haut never mentioned seeing any aliens until the “death bed” document was released a couple of months ago. I think that he originally said that he only talked to a nurse who saw them.

Thanks for the compliments on the book. I used the electrogravitics research as a tangent to possibly explain some of the things that Bennewitz was seeing in the late 1970s/ early ’80s, as well as the Cash-Landrum case.

Yes, that Eastern European video had the whole crowd in on it. The UFO looks pretty bad too.

Good to see you on the site! There is a history of the brightness level of lights associated with UFO movement.

Good work! The identical trees are a good giveaway. How did you connect the videos to “Issac,?”