“Human UFOs”
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: as our technology develops, it’s going to become more and more difficult to differentiate between what may be a genuine UFO and what may be an aerial platform of distinctly human origins.
And while the “UFO” that features in this article (and in the accompanying YouTube footage, too) is not particularly large in size, it is indeed decidedly unconventional in appearance.
Can we expect to see more and more of these things built and flown in the years to come? Most certainly. And doubtless other companies will be building such similar drones for use in domestic surveillance programs too - something which Mac Tonnies briefly comments on with respect to the ever-increasing surveillance state that the world is becoming.
I think it’s fair to say that in twenty years from now, the skies of our planet will look very different, and they may well be populated by an ever-increasing number of exotic-looking UFOs. Except they won’t be piloted by little green or gray men with big, black eyes.
Their UFOs may ultimately become eclipsed by our UFOs.
And of course this begs the question: how many other UFO reports that our community perceives as being evidence that ET is among us also have origins that are far closer to home?
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, July 10th, 2007 at 7:48 am and is filed under Alien Encounters, Breaking News, Close Encounters, Evidence, Government Projects, The Redfern Files, UFO Sightings, UFOlogy. You can follow responses via RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is not allowed.
del.icio.us Digg Reddit BlinkList Google Ma.gnolia StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Help
- Related News Stories:
- Human Origins »
- UFO? Drone? »
- Tonnies on UFOs »
- Roswell: A Human Experiment »
- A UFO Novel »
- Beyond “Best Evidence” »
- Screening the Aliens »
- UFOs, The Paranormal, and Multi-Dimensions »
- “Alarming” News »
- UFOs in Sweden »
|
Jul 10 2007 
July 10th, 2007 at 8:19 am
Nick, I agree 100%
July 10th, 2007 at 9:26 am
Not just ufos, with recent advancements in cloaking & invisibility technology, many of the paranormal fields could be difficult to distinguish from human technology.
July 10th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
I think you worry too much-the one figure that I notice is absent from the report on the ‘Micro’ is endurance-on
a platform that size, I doubt it can
hover more than 15-20 minutes. Useful
in tactical military situations, but
not something thats going to be hovering
over every street corner…
July 10th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Craig:
I wouldn’t say this worries me as such in terms of me personally worrying or panicking.
Rather, the public apathy and complacency to such things makes me very, very angry. Worry isn’t so much the issue.
As for not appearing on every street corner, I would beg to differ. Indeed, I would refer you to this:
And this (note the comments from Ian Redhead - who is a very senior UK police source, and so who knows what he is talking about - who, eerily enough, also makes an “every street corner” comment, but from a very different perspective to yours):
http://www.express.co.uk/news/view/7613
July 10th, 2007 at 1:48 pm
The New York bit is news to me, Thanks.
I find the traffic blocks to be more disturbing than the cameras, but only just…Readhead’s comments in the second
cite do give one some cause for hope, though,no? I mean, if someone that high
up is saying ‘Just a minute…’ then at least it won’t simply slide into place.
Maybe. I do understand your anger at the
greater Western ( Is this sort of thing
happening in Europe? ) apathy, even enthusiasm for increased surveilance, and the ‘worry ‘ comment was rather glib
on my part-my apologies. But I wonder sometimes if
we aren’t headed for something like
Tokugawa Japan-an insular and effective
police state that endured for two
hundred and fifty years, until it was finally opened…from without…
July 10th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Craig
I think a police state could easily become a reality. But I suspect that it will arrive purely due to the gradual introduction of more and more surveillance and the eroding of civil liberties, until the point where the future we dread has arrived, under our very noses.
In Europe (and particularly in the UK), street cameras at practically every corner in the towns and cities are a way of life.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m not against being protected in such a fashion, or that such devices could be used to track criminals etc.
My concern (and I believe it to be a valid one) is this issue of governments using fear tactics to pass new surveillance bills and laws, and using the terror threat as justification for this and for that, when there is not always a connection at all.
Do we need protection from outside threats? Yes. Do our streets need to be safe? Yes. But does the entire population need to be watched and surveyed at every given moment? No. But we will be unless we stand up as a united front.
I know too that in the UK much of the new planned surveillance drone project is not aimed at criminals; rather it’s aimed at people taking part in “organized protests” and what some perceive as “anti-social activity.”
This “anti-social activity” includes taking part in legitimate protest targeted at Government policies.
Frankly, I should be able to voice my concerns in a public forum about a government policy I disagree with, and all without a remotely piloted UFO hovering over me using facial recognition technology (which I know the UK Police are now testing) to see who I am.
You are correct, however, that people like Redhead (who does hold a high position) are recognizing this problem, and if we all do likewise, things may pull through.
I guess we will see…!